From patchwork Tue Jun 13 22:50:25 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kemeng Shi X-Patchwork-Id: 1794553 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2221:ea00::3; helo=gandalf.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=srs0=gbal=cb=vger.kernel.org=linux-ext4-owner@ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (mail.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2221:ea00::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4QgWfT1pQpz20Wq for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 00:49:21 +1000 (AEST) Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (gandalf.ozlabs.org [150.107.74.76]) by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4QgWfR3mgRz4x48 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 00:49:19 +1000 (AEST) Received: by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) id 4QgWfR3bwXz4x4G; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 00:49:19 +1000 (AEST) Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: gandalf.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com Authentication-Results: gandalf.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; helo=out1.vger.email; envelope-from=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; receiver=) Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4QgWfR3VWLz4x48 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 00:49:19 +1000 (AEST) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242630AbjFMOtR (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2023 10:49:17 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57908 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S242625AbjFMOtM (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2023 10:49:12 -0400 Received: from dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (dggsgout11.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.51]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D45C41981; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 07:49:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.67.153]) by dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4QgWfD0cZlz4f3pr8; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 22:49:08 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.175.124.27]) by APP2 (Coremail) with SMTP id Syh0CgDHu+njgYhkYjUjLg--.22967S2; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 22:49:08 +0800 (CST) From: Kemeng Shi To: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca Cc: s.l-h@gmx.de, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shikemeng@huaweicloud.com Subject: [PATCH] Revert "ext4: remove unnecessary check in ext4_bg_num_gdb_nometa" Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 06:50:25 +0800 Message-Id: <20230613225025.3859522-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CM-TRANSID: Syh0CgDHu+njgYhkYjUjLg--.22967S2 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvdXoW7XFWxWw4DKrW3Ww1rZr1rXrb_yoWkKFcEka y7KF1rX3yaqr1Syry2grsYgr1akFW0yr98XFnxGFyfua4xtF4rC3WDXr95ZrZrWay7Z3s5 ZryxXa4xJa1xtjkaLaAFLSUrUUUUUb8apTn2vfkv8UJUUUU8Yxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT 9fnUUIcSsGvfJTRUUUbxxFF20E14v26r1j6r4UM7CY07I20VC2zVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG 6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M280x2IEY4vEnII2IxkI6r1a6r45M28lY4IEw2IIxx k0rwA2F7IY1VAKz4vEj48ve4kI8wA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Ar0_tr1l84ACjcxK 6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr1j6F4UJwA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIE14v26rxl6s0DM28EF7 xvwVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW0oVCq3wAS0I0E0xvYzxvE52x082IY62kv0487Mc02F40E FcxC0VAKzVAqx4xG6I80ewAv7VC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUGwAv7VC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr 0_Gr1lOx8S6xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r4UM4x0Y48IcxkI7VAKI48JM4x0x7Aq67IIx4CEVc8v x2IErcIFxwCF04k20xvY0x0EwIxGrwCFx2IqxVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwC20s026c02F4 0E14v26r1j6r18MI8I3I0E7480Y4vE14v26r106r1rMI8E67AF67kF1VAFwI0_JF0_Jw1l IxkGc2Ij64vIr41lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxV AFwI0_Gr0_Cr1lIxAIcVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6Fyj6rWUJwCI42IY6I8E87Iv67AKxVWU JVW8JwCI42IY6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26r4j6r4UJbIYCTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvjTRCA pnUUUUU X-CM-SenderInfo: 5vklyvpphqwq5kxd4v5lfo033gof0z/ X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org This reverts commit ad3f09be6cfe332be8ff46c78e6ec0f8839107aa. The reverted commit was intended to simpfy the code to get group descriptor block number in non-meta block group by assuming s_gdb_count is block number used for all non-meta block group descriptors. However s_gdb_count is block number used for all meta *and* non-meta group descriptors. So s_gdb_group will be > actual group descriptor block number used for all non-meta block group which should be "total non-meta block group" / "group descriptors per block", e.g. s_first_meta_bg. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi --- fs/ext4/balloc.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/balloc.c b/fs/ext4/balloc.c index c1edde817be8..09c75a3127c7 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/balloc.c +++ b/fs/ext4/balloc.c @@ -886,7 +886,10 @@ static unsigned long ext4_bg_num_gdb_nometa(struct super_block *sb, if (!ext4_bg_has_super(sb, group)) return 0; - return EXT4_SB(sb)->s_gdb_count; + if (ext4_has_feature_meta_bg(sb)) + return le32_to_cpu(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_es->s_first_meta_bg); + else + return EXT4_SB(sb)->s_gdb_count; } /**