From patchwork Mon Apr 17 11:06:14 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kemeng Shi X-Patchwork-Id: 1769432 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2221:ea00::3; helo=gandalf.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=srs0=hzdb=ai=vger.kernel.org=linux-ext4-owner@ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (mail.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2221:ea00::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Q0Bjb2phQz1yb4 for ; Mon, 17 Apr 2023 13:04:35 +1000 (AEST) Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (gandalf.ozlabs.org [150.107.74.76]) by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Q0Bjb2LdVz4xKS for ; Mon, 17 Apr 2023 13:04:35 +1000 (AEST) Received: by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) id 4Q0Bjb2Htkz4xKV; Mon, 17 Apr 2023 13:04:35 +1000 (AEST) Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: gandalf.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com Authentication-Results: gandalf.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; helo=out1.vger.email; envelope-from=linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org; receiver=) Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Q0Bjb2C0Kz4xKS for ; Mon, 17 Apr 2023 13:04:35 +1000 (AEST) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230183AbjDQDEd (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Apr 2023 23:04:33 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:32996 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229849AbjDQDED (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Apr 2023 23:04:03 -0400 Received: from dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (unknown [45.249.212.56]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E595C2D4C; Sun, 16 Apr 2023 20:04:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.67.143]) by dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Q0Bhs4n21z4f3yqn; Mon, 17 Apr 2023 11:03:57 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.175.124.27]) by APP1 (Coremail) with SMTP id cCh0CgAXODIXtzxkfzJgHA--.17426S18; Mon, 17 Apr 2023 11:03:59 +0800 (CST) From: Kemeng Shi To: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, ojaswin@linux.ibm.com Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shikemeng@huaweicloud.com Subject: [PATCH v3 16/19] ext4: call ext4_mb_mark_group_bb in ext4_mb_clear_bb Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 19:06:14 +0800 Message-Id: <20230417110617.2664129-17-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.0 In-Reply-To: <20230417110617.2664129-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> References: <20230417110617.2664129-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CM-TRANSID: cCh0CgAXODIXtzxkfzJgHA--.17426S18 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoWxKrWDAFW7Kr13XFW7WFyDJrb_yoW7Ar1Dpr 98tFnrCr4rGFnF9F40k34UXF1fKw18W347JrWfCr93Cr1ayr93KFZ7tFnavFWUtFZ3X3Wq qr1Y93yUur4xW37anT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUP214x267AKxVWrJVCq3wAFc2x0x2IEx4CE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0 rVWrJVCq3wAFIxvE14AKwVWUJVWUGwA2jI8I6cxK62vIxIIY0VWUZVW8XwA2048vs2IY02 0E87I2jVAFwI0_JF0E3s1l82xGYIkIc2x26xkF7I0E14v26ryj6s0DM28lY4IEw2IIxxk0 rwA2F7IY1VAKz4vEj48ve4kI8wA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_tr0E3s1l84ACjcxK6x IIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Cr1j6rxdM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVAFwI0_GcCE3s1l84ACjcxK 6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26rxl6s0DM2AIxVAIcxkEcVAq07x20xvEncxIr21l5I8CrVACY4 xI64kE6c02F40Ex7xfMcIj6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r18McIj6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8 JwAm72CE4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lF7xvr2IYc2Ij64vIr41lF7I21c0EjII2zVCS5cI20V AGYxC7MxAIw28IcxkI7VAKI48JMxC20s026xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r4UMI8I3I0E5I8CrVAF wI0_Jr0_Jr4lx2IqxVCjr7xvwVAFwI0_JrI_JrWlx4CE17CEb7AF67AKxVWUAVWUtwCIc4 0Y0x0EwIxGrwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r4j6ryUMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AK xVW8Jr0_Cr1UMIIF0xvE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6I8E87Iv67AKxVW8JV WxJwCI42IY6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26r4UJVWxJrUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7sRiVb yDUUUUU== X-CM-SenderInfo: 5vklyvpphqwq5kxd4v5lfo033gof0z/ X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS,MAY_BE_FORGED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org call ext4_mb_mark_group_bb in ext4_mb_clear_bb to remove repeat code to update block bitmap and group descriptor on disk. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi --- fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 86 +++++++++++++---------------------------------- 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c index bd440614db76..1dad154c9b22 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c @@ -6077,18 +6077,19 @@ static void ext4_mb_clear_bb(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode, ext4_fsblk_t block, unsigned long count, int flags) { - struct buffer_head *bitmap_bh = NULL; + struct ext4_mark_context mc = { + .handle = handle, + .sb = inode->i_sb, + .state = 0, + }; struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb; - struct ext4_group_desc *gdp; unsigned int overflow; ext4_grpblk_t bit; - struct buffer_head *gd_bh; ext4_group_t block_group; struct ext4_sb_info *sbi; struct ext4_buddy e4b; unsigned int count_clusters; int err = 0; - int ret; sbi = EXT4_SB(sb); @@ -6120,18 +6121,6 @@ static void ext4_mb_clear_bb(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode, /* The range changed so it's no longer validated */ flags &= ~EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_VALIDATED; } - count_clusters = EXT4_NUM_B2C(sbi, count); - bitmap_bh = ext4_read_block_bitmap(sb, block_group); - if (IS_ERR(bitmap_bh)) { - err = PTR_ERR(bitmap_bh); - bitmap_bh = NULL; - goto error_return; - } - gdp = ext4_get_group_desc(sb, block_group, &gd_bh); - if (!gdp) { - err = -EIO; - goto error_return; - } if (!(flags & EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_VALIDATED) && !ext4_inode_block_valid(inode, block, count)) { @@ -6141,28 +6130,7 @@ static void ext4_mb_clear_bb(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode, goto error_return; } - BUFFER_TRACE(bitmap_bh, "getting write access"); - err = ext4_journal_get_write_access(handle, sb, bitmap_bh, - EXT4_JTR_NONE); - if (err) - goto error_return; - - /* - * We are about to modify some metadata. Call the journal APIs - * to unshare ->b_data if a currently-committing transaction is - * using it - */ - BUFFER_TRACE(gd_bh, "get_write_access"); - err = ext4_journal_get_write_access(handle, sb, gd_bh, EXT4_JTR_NONE); - if (err) - goto error_return; -#ifdef AGGRESSIVE_CHECK - { - int i; - for (i = 0; i < count_clusters; i++) - BUG_ON(!mb_test_bit(bit + i, bitmap_bh->b_data)); - } -#endif + count_clusters = EXT4_NUM_B2C(sbi, count); trace_ext4_mballoc_free(sb, inode, block_group, bit, count_clusters); /* __GFP_NOFAIL: retry infinitely, ignore TIF_MEMDIE and memcg limit. */ @@ -6171,6 +6139,23 @@ static void ext4_mb_clear_bb(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode, if (err) goto error_return; +#ifdef AGGRESSIVE_CHECK + err = ext4_mb_mark_group_bb(&mc, block_group, bit, count_clusters, + EXT4_MB_BITMAP_MARKED_CHECK); +#else + err = ext4_mb_mark_group_bb(&mc, block_group, bit, count_clusters, + 0); +#endif + + if (err && mc.changed == 0) { + ext4_mb_unload_buddy(&e4b); + goto error_return; + } + +#ifdef AGGRESSIVE_CHECK + BUG_ON(mc.changed != count_clusters); +#endif + /* * We need to make sure we don't reuse the freed block until after the * transaction is committed. We make an exception if the inode is to be @@ -6193,7 +6178,6 @@ static void ext4_mb_clear_bb(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode, new_entry->efd_tid = handle->h_transaction->t_tid; ext4_lock_group(sb, block_group); - mb_clear_bits(bitmap_bh->b_data, bit, count_clusters); ext4_mb_free_metadata(handle, &e4b, new_entry); } else { /* need to update group_info->bb_free and bitmap @@ -6212,23 +6196,11 @@ static void ext4_mb_clear_bb(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode, EXT4_MB_GRP_CLEAR_TRIMMED(e4b.bd_info); ext4_lock_group(sb, block_group); - mb_clear_bits(bitmap_bh->b_data, bit, count_clusters); mb_free_blocks(inode, &e4b, bit, count_clusters); } - ret = ext4_free_group_clusters(sb, gdp) + count_clusters; - ext4_free_group_clusters_set(sb, gdp, ret); - ext4_block_bitmap_csum_set(sb, gdp, bitmap_bh); - ext4_group_desc_csum_set(sb, block_group, gdp); ext4_unlock_group(sb, block_group); - if (sbi->s_log_groups_per_flex) { - ext4_group_t flex_group = ext4_flex_group(sbi, block_group); - atomic64_add(count_clusters, - &sbi_array_rcu_deref(sbi, s_flex_groups, - flex_group)->free_clusters); - } - /* * on a bigalloc file system, defer the s_freeclusters_counter * update to the caller (ext4_remove_space and friends) so they @@ -6243,26 +6215,14 @@ static void ext4_mb_clear_bb(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode, ext4_mb_unload_buddy(&e4b); - /* We dirtied the bitmap block */ - BUFFER_TRACE(bitmap_bh, "dirtied bitmap block"); - err = ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(handle, NULL, bitmap_bh); - - /* And the group descriptor block */ - BUFFER_TRACE(gd_bh, "dirtied group descriptor block"); - ret = ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(handle, NULL, gd_bh); - if (!err) - err = ret; - if (overflow && !err) { block += count; count = overflow; - put_bh(bitmap_bh); /* The range changed so it's no longer validated */ flags &= ~EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_VALIDATED; goto do_more; } error_return: - brelse(bitmap_bh); ext4_std_error(sb, err); return; }