@@ -2527,10 +2527,6 @@ static int change_mount_ro_state(struct mount *mnt, unsigned int mnt_flags)
return 0;
}
-/*
- * Update the user-settable attributes on a mount. The caller must hold
- * sb->s_umount for writing.
- */
static void set_mount_attributes(struct mount *mnt, unsigned int mnt_flags)
{
mnt_flags |= mnt->mnt.mnt_flags & ~MNT_USER_SETTABLE_MASK;
@@ -2580,13 +2576,17 @@ static int do_reconfigure_mnt(struct path *path, unsigned int mnt_flags)
if (!can_change_locked_flags(mnt, mnt_flags))
return -EPERM;
- down_write(&sb->s_umount);
+ /*
+ * We're only checking whether the superblock is read-only not
+ * changing it, so only take down_read(&sb->s_umount).
+ */
+ down_read(&sb->s_umount);
lock_mount_hash();
ret = change_mount_ro_state(mnt, mnt_flags);
if (ret == 0)
set_mount_attributes(mnt, mnt_flags);
unlock_mount_hash();
- up_write(&sb->s_umount);
+ up_read(&sb->s_umount);
mnt_warn_timestamp_expiry(path, &mnt->mnt);
do_reconfigure_mnt() used to take the down_write(&sb->s_umount) lock which seems unnecessary since we're not changing the superblock. We're only checking whether it is already read-only. Setting other mount attributes is protected by lock_mount_hash() afaict and not by s_umount. The history of down_write(&sb->s_umount) lock being taken when setting mount attributes dates back to the introduction of MNT_READONLY in [2]. This introduced the concept of having read-only mounts in contrast to just having a read-only superblock. When it got introduced it was simply plumbed into do_remount() which already took down_write(&sb->s_umount) because it was only used to actually change the superblock before [2]. Afaict, it would've already been possible back then to only use down_read(&sb->s_umount) for MS_BIND | MS_REMOUNT since actual mount options were protected by the vfsmount lock already. But that would've meant special casing the locking for MS_BIND | MS_REMOUNT in do_remount() which people might not have considered worth it. Then in [1] MS_BIND | MS_REMOUNT mount option changes were split out of do_remount() into do_reconfigure_mnt() but the down_write(&sb->s_umount) lock was simply copied over. Now that we have this be a separate helper only take the down_read(&sb->s_umount) lock since we're only interested in checking whether the super block is currently read-only and blocking any writers from changing it. Essentially, checking that the super block is read-only has the advantage that we can avoid having to go into the slowpath and through MNT_WRITE_HOLD and can simply set the read-only flag on the mount in set_mount_attributes(). [1]: commit 43f5e655eff7 ("vfs: Separate changing mount flags full remount") [2]: commit 2e4b7fcd9260 ("[PATCH] r/o bind mounts: honor mount writer counts at remount") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210112220124.837960-4-christian.brauner@ubuntu.com Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com> --- /* v2 */ unchanged /* v3 */ unchanged /* v4 */ unchanged /* v5 */ unchanged base-commit: 7c53f6b671f4aba70ff15e1b05148b10d58c2837 /* v6 */ unchanged base-commit: 19c329f6808995b142b3966301f217c831e7cf31 --- fs/namespace.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)