diff mbox series

ext4: remove redundant assignment to node

Message ID 20190619090007.26962-1-colin.king@canonical.com
State Accepted, archived
Headers show
Series ext4: remove redundant assignment to node | expand

Commit Message

Colin Ian King June 19, 2019, 9 a.m. UTC
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

Pointer 'node' is assigned a value that is never read, node is
later overwritten when it re-assigned a different value inside
the while-loop.  The assignment is redundant and can be removed.

Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
---
 fs/ext4/extents_status.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Jan Kara June 19, 2019, 11:13 a.m. UTC | #1
On Wed 19-06-19 10:00:06, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> 
> Pointer 'node' is assigned a value that is never read, node is
> later overwritten when it re-assigned a different value inside
> the while-loop.  The assignment is redundant and can be removed.
> 
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

Looks good to me. You can add:

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

								Honza

> ---
>  fs/ext4/extents_status.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents_status.c b/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
> index 023a3eb3afa3..7521de2dcf3a 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
> @@ -1317,7 +1317,6 @@ static int es_do_reclaim_extents(struct ext4_inode_info *ei, ext4_lblk_t end,
>  	es = __es_tree_search(&tree->root, ei->i_es_shrink_lblk);
>  	if (!es)
>  		goto out_wrap;
> -	node = &es->rb_node;
>  	while (*nr_to_scan > 0) {
>  		if (es->es_lblk > end) {
>  			ei->i_es_shrink_lblk = end + 1;
> -- 
> 2.20.1
>
Theodore Ts'o June 20, 2019, 4:12 a.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 10:00:06AM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> 
> Pointer 'node' is assigned a value that is never read, node is
> later overwritten when it re-assigned a different value inside
> the while-loop.  The assignment is redundant and can be removed.
> 
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

Applied, thanks.

						- Ted
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents_status.c b/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
index 023a3eb3afa3..7521de2dcf3a 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
@@ -1317,7 +1317,6 @@  static int es_do_reclaim_extents(struct ext4_inode_info *ei, ext4_lblk_t end,
 	es = __es_tree_search(&tree->root, ei->i_es_shrink_lblk);
 	if (!es)
 		goto out_wrap;
-	node = &es->rb_node;
 	while (*nr_to_scan > 0) {
 		if (es->es_lblk > end) {
 			ei->i_es_shrink_lblk = end + 1;