| Message ID | 1621220165-11849-1-git-send-email-tiantao6@hisilicon.com |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | ext4: remove set but rewrite variables | expand |
> On 17 May 2021, at 05:56, Tian Tao <tiantao6@hisilicon.com> wrote: > > In line 2500 of the ext4_dx_add_entry function, the at variable is > assigned but not used, and it is reassigned in line 2449, so delete > the assignment of the at variable in line 2500. > > Signed-off-by: Tian Tao <tiantao6@hisilicon.com> > --- > fs/ext4/namei.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/namei.c b/fs/ext4/namei.c > index afb9d05..18bbf15 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/namei.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/namei.c > @@ -2497,7 +2497,7 @@ static int ext4_dx_add_entry(handle_t *handle, struct ext4_filename *fname, > > /* Which index block gets the new entry? */ > if (at - entries >= icount1) { > - frame->at = at = at - entries - icount1 + entries2; > + frame->at = at - entries - icount1 + entries2; > frame->entries = entries = entries2; > swap(frame->bh, bh2); > } > -- > 2.7.4 > Hello Tian, Thank you for the patch. Please, clarify, do you think the logic not changed after you patch if "while (frame > frames) {“ loop is not executed or terminated by “break:” in " if (dx_get_count((frame - 1)->entries) < ...“ block? Also I am not sure code lines numbers in the description are useful for future readers, because they can be changed. Thank you.
在 2021/5/17 16:05, Благодаренко Артём 写道: > >> On 17 May 2021, at 05:56, Tian Tao <tiantao6@hisilicon.com> wrote: >> >> In line 2500 of the ext4_dx_add_entry function, the at variable is >> assigned but not used, and it is reassigned in line 2449, so delete >> the assignment of the at variable in line 2500. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tian Tao <tiantao6@hisilicon.com> >> --- >> fs/ext4/namei.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/ext4/namei.c b/fs/ext4/namei.c >> index afb9d05..18bbf15 100644 >> --- a/fs/ext4/namei.c >> +++ b/fs/ext4/namei.c >> @@ -2497,7 +2497,7 @@ static int ext4_dx_add_entry(handle_t *handle, struct ext4_filename *fname, >> >> /* Which index block gets the new entry? */ >> if (at - entries >= icount1) { >> - frame->at = at = at - entries - icount1 + entries2; >> + frame->at = at - entries - icount1 + entries2; >> frame->entries = entries = entries2; >> swap(frame->bh, bh2); >> } >> -- >> 2.7.4 >> > > Hello Tian, > > Thank you for the patch. > > Please, clarify, do you think the logic not changed after you patch if "while (frame > frames) {“ loop is not executed or terminated by “break:” in " if (dx_get_count((frame - 1)->entries) < ...“ block? yes, it's reported by svace. and I check the code it's not change the logic. myabe I was wrong:-P > Also I am not sure code lines numbers in the description are useful for future readers, because they can be changed. I can update the commit message at v2. > > Thank you.. >
It looks like it is always reset just after “again:” label. So, yes, your fix does not change the logic. Feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Artem Blagodarenko <artem.blagodarenko@gmail.com> Best regards, Artem Blagodarenko > On 17 May 2021, at 11:44, tiantao (H) <tiantao6@huawei.com> wrote: > > > 在 2021/5/17 16:05, Благодаренко Артём 写道: >> >>> On 17 May 2021, at 05:56, Tian Tao <tiantao6@hisilicon.com> wrote: >>> >>> In line 2500 of the ext4_dx_add_entry function, the at variable is >>> assigned but not used, and it is reassigned in line 2449, so delete >>> the assignment of the at variable in line 2500. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Tian Tao <tiantao6@hisilicon.com> >>> --- >>> fs/ext4/namei.c | 2 +- >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/namei.c b/fs/ext4/namei.c >>> index afb9d05..18bbf15 100644 >>> --- a/fs/ext4/namei.c >>> +++ b/fs/ext4/namei.c >>> @@ -2497,7 +2497,7 @@ static int ext4_dx_add_entry(handle_t *handle, struct ext4_filename *fname, >>> >>> /* Which index block gets the new entry? */ >>> if (at - entries >= icount1) { >>> - frame->at = at = at - entries - icount1 + entries2; >>> + frame->at = at - entries - icount1 + entries2; >>> frame->entries = entries = entries2; >>> swap(frame->bh, bh2); >>> } >>> -- >>> 2.7.4 >>> >> >> Hello Tian, >> >> Thank you for the patch. >> >> Please, clarify, do you think the logic not changed after you patch if "while (frame > frames) {“ loop is not executed or terminated by “break:” in " if (dx_get_count((frame - 1)->entries) < ...“ block? > > yes, it's reported by svace. and I check the code it's not change the logic. myabe I was wrong:-P > >> Also I am not sure code lines numbers in the description are useful for future readers, because they can be changed. > I can update the commit message at v2. >> >> Thank you..
diff --git a/fs/ext4/namei.c b/fs/ext4/namei.c index afb9d05..18bbf15 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/namei.c +++ b/fs/ext4/namei.c @@ -2497,7 +2497,7 @@ static int ext4_dx_add_entry(handle_t *handle, struct ext4_filename *fname, /* Which index block gets the new entry? */ if (at - entries >= icount1) { - frame->at = at = at - entries - icount1 + entries2; + frame->at = at - entries - icount1 + entries2; frame->entries = entries = entries2; swap(frame->bh, bh2); }
In line 2500 of the ext4_dx_add_entry function, the at variable is assigned but not used, and it is reassigned in line 2449, so delete the assignment of the at variable in line 2500. Signed-off-by: Tian Tao <tiantao6@hisilicon.com> --- fs/ext4/namei.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)