@@ -856,10 +856,6 @@ static int ext4_splice_branch(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
}
/* We are done with atomic stuff, now do the rest of housekeeping */
-
- inode->i_ctime = ext4_current_time(inode);
- ext4_mark_inode_dirty(handle, inode);
-
/* had we spliced it onto indirect block? */
if (where->bh) {
/*
@@ -878,8 +874,8 @@ static int ext4_splice_branch(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
} else {
/*
* OK, we spliced it into the inode itself on a direct block.
- * Inode was dirtied above.
*/
+ ext4_mark_inode_dirty(handle, inode);
jbd_debug(5, "splicing direct\n");
}
return err;
The VFS handles updating ctime, so we don't need to update the inode's ctime in ext4_splace_branch() to update the direct or indirect blocks. This was harmless when we did this in ext3, but in ext4, thanks to delayed allocation, updating the ctime in ext4_splice_branch() can cause the ctime to mysteriously jump when the blocks are finally allocated. Thanks to Björn Steinbrink for pointing out this problem on the git mailing list. Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> --- fs/ext4/inode.c | 6 +----- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)