Message ID | 20240404111032.10427-1-luis.henriques@linux.dev |
---|---|
Headers | show
Return-Path: <SRS0=T1P7=LJ=vger.kernel.org=linux-ext4+bounces-1853-patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@ozlabs.org> X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=key1 header.b=CZYlFAxg; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=ozlabs.org (client-ip=150.107.74.76; helo=gandalf.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=srs0=t1p7=lj=vger.kernel.org=linux-ext4+bounces-1853-patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@ozlabs.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (gandalf.ozlabs.org [150.107.74.76]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4V9Jnv6m1hz1yYf for <incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org>; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 22:10:59 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (gandalf.ozlabs.org [150.107.74.76]) by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4V9Jns29V9z4wd7 for <incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org>; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 22:10:57 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) id 4V9Jns26xmz4wcr; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 22:10:57 +1100 (AEDT) Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: gandalf.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: gandalf.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=key1 header.b=CZYlFAxg; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: gandalf.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=147.75.80.249; helo=am.mirrors.kernel.org; envelope-from=linux-ext4+bounces-1853-patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@vger.kernel.org; receiver=ozlabs.org) Received: from am.mirrors.kernel.org (am.mirrors.kernel.org [147.75.80.249]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gandalf.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4V9Jnp6915z4wcb for <patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org>; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 22:10:54 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by am.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BADE1F21E9B for <patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org>; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 11:10:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35C0582860; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 11:10:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="CZYlFAxg" X-Original-To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Received: from out-188.mta1.migadu.com (out-188.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.188]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9862580BF7 for <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 11:10:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.188 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712229042; cv=none; b=mAK1kJiWR7GJ8DkH1rpXGJeHTK1guWsB0dH5gjolqIDYTcF8GC54o8UeUHEdeK7le5+VVoYiXtTD/EfQN3ZGFJnzVUz9zIbGh9OmqmBZUAF2FgVmvL7e91d/j+hUy+GINJ22Dx0A1uA21m7LyOR6rbgxRUtgnPPRDXmUz/76TDU= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712229042; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4k8DGJDY7P/Gx02R9MwxXa6TDY6CRaUE8B6PgO7bByA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=shZBm2shzVHJ12aE08ZNnmvsBf0MbMDpfxVELp67P2R1lsl52fBxRvZ59v/l3bWeW5O7XKHcYMWXkI36Pso5rWasN6MJ2jiEzv6skbUDi8zlZtJIJLYmwRO8MTc8hm9g2U4bzwk4B2mmeaeQQEUV4YuRDF4RKopRUmkg6hkv2bo= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=CZYlFAxg; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.188 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1712229037; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2fKSBK9hqR9y6H7m4T/N9tWpot5JVaN8og88kNoWAHk=; b=CZYlFAxgNBEtTqIvMM24dqRP+dQj7X2DTs2guLyleJDfc+K/t3kNw3LjLcohTzU2aZ0yXJ 9N4mN4Naf3BKrJc9QRZd/RrwHj0NKicGfPpvNstnULlYnuT1PQTKbRSF/YtHlpi8KiytWK wLU4xBiCX7Yirk4tppzSCJo2gYIycw4= From: "Luis Henriques (SUSE)" <luis.henriques@linux.dev> To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca> Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, "Luis Henriques (SUSE)" <luis.henriques@linux.dev> Subject: [PATCH e2fsprogs v2 0/4] quota-related e2fsck fixes and tests Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 12:10:28 +0100 Message-ID: <20240404111032.10427-1-luis.henriques@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List-Id: <linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:linux-ext4+subscribe@vger.kernel.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:linux-ext4+unsubscribe@vger.kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT |
Series |
quota-related e2fsck fixes and tests
|
expand
|
Hi! I'm (re)sending two fixes to e2fsck that are related with quota handling. The fixes are the first two patches, the other two are test cases for these fixes. As I mentioned in v1, the issues were found using fstests ext4/014 and ext4/019. And the only thing in this series that changed from v1 was the first test ("tests: new test to check quota after directory optimization"), which is now using a much simplified version of the testcase. Note that, since the first two patches didn't change, they have already a Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca> which I'm not including in the patches themselves. Should I? Or is that better left for the maintainer (eventually) applying them? Cheers,