Message ID | 20181026184447.13547-2-anirudh.venkataramanan@intel.com |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Delegated to: | Jeff Kirsher |
Headers | show |
Series | Bug fixes for ice, set 2/2 | expand |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Intel-wired-lan [mailto:intel-wired-lan-bounces@osuosl.org] On > Behalf Of Anirudh Venkataramanan > Sent: Friday, October 26, 2018 11:45 AM > To: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org > Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH S9 01/15] ice: Increase rx queue disable > timeout > > From: Piotr Raczynski <piotr.raczynski@intel.com> > > With much traffic coming into the port, rx queue disable procedure can take > more time until all pending queue requests on PCIe finish. Reuse > ICE_Q_WAIT_MAX_RETRY macro and increase the delay itself. > > Signed-off-by: Piotr Raczynski <piotr.raczynski@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Anirudh Venkataramanan > <anirudh.venkataramanan@intel.com> > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Tested-by: Andrew Bowers <andrewx.bowers@intel.com>
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c index 1efd760debc2..f6e21363c8d6 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c @@ -174,15 +174,15 @@ static int ice_pf_rxq_wait(struct ice_pf *pf, int pf_q, bool ena) { int i; - for (i = 0; i < ICE_Q_WAIT_RETRY_LIMIT; i++) { + for (i = 0; i < ICE_Q_WAIT_MAX_RETRY; i++) { u32 rx_reg = rd32(&pf->hw, QRX_CTRL(pf_q)); if (ena == !!(rx_reg & QRX_CTRL_QENA_STAT_M)) break; - usleep_range(10, 20); + usleep_range(20, 40); } - if (i >= ICE_Q_WAIT_RETRY_LIMIT) + if (i >= ICE_Q_WAIT_MAX_RETRY) return -ETIMEDOUT; return 0;