Message ID | CAFC8iJ+d8+ooR8NnjKfKAE_2E5mHzdvC2U5P2Jhx76vcEWeeQw@mail.gmail.com |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 04:09:01PM +0000, Jose Blanquicet wrote: > I tried what you suggested and it worked for me: > > diff --git a/src/drivers/driver_nl80211.c b/src/drivers/driver_nl80211.c > index 6080079..5470312 100644 > --- a/src/drivers/driver_nl80211.c > +++ b/src/drivers/driver_nl80211.c > @@ -3783,7 +3783,8 @@ static int wpa_driver_nl80211_set_ap(void *priv, > beacon_set); > if (beacon_set) > cmd = NL80211_CMD_SET_BEACON; > - else if (!nl80211_get_wiphy_data_ap(bss)) > + else if (!drv->device_ap_sme && !drv->use_monitor && > + !nl80211_get_wiphy_data_ap(bss)) > return -ENOBUFS; > > wpa_hexdump(MSG_DEBUG, "nl80211: Beacon head", > > What does Jouni think about this solution? This looks like the correct thing to do here. nl80211_get_wiphy_data_ap() used to be called from nl80211_mgmt_subscribe_ap() and that function is within that same !device_ap_sme && !use_monitor case. Could you please send this patch with a proper commit message and Signed-off-by: line so that I can apply it?
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Jouni Malinen wrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 04:09:01PM +0000, Jose Blanquicet wrote: >> I tried what you suggested and it worked for me: >> >> diff --git a/src/drivers/driver_nl80211.c b/src/drivers/driver_nl80211.c >> index 6080079..5470312 100644 >> --- a/src/drivers/driver_nl80211.c >> +++ b/src/drivers/driver_nl80211.c >> @@ -3783,7 +3783,8 @@ static int wpa_driver_nl80211_set_ap(void *priv, >> beacon_set); >> if (beacon_set) >> cmd = NL80211_CMD_SET_BEACON; >> - else if (!nl80211_get_wiphy_data_ap(bss)) >> + else if (!drv->device_ap_sme && !drv->use_monitor && >> + !nl80211_get_wiphy_data_ap(bss)) >> return -ENOBUFS; >> >> wpa_hexdump(MSG_DEBUG, "nl80211: Beacon head", >> >> What does Jouni think about this solution? > > This looks like the correct thing to do here. > nl80211_get_wiphy_data_ap() used to be called from > nl80211_mgmt_subscribe_ap() and that function is within that same > !device_ap_sme && !use_monitor case. > > Could you please send this patch with a proper commit message and > Signed-off-by: line so that I can apply it? It would not be a problem at all but due to I just followed Lansky's suggestion, I was wondering if maybe he would prefer to do it himself. Lansky, would you? Regards, Jose Blanquicet
Hi Jouni, See attached patch to fix this issue. Thanks, Dedy. -----Original Message----- From: Jose Blanquicet [mailto:blanquicet@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, February 3, 2017 2:47 PM To: Lansky, Dedy <dlansky@qti.qualcomm.com> Cc: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>; MANIEZZO Marco (MM) <marco.maniezzo@magnetimarelli.com>; hostap@lists.infradead.org; Masashi Honma <masashi.honma@gmail.com>; qca_dlansky <qca_dlansky@qca.qualcomm.com> Subject: Re: Error while enabling AP using wpa_supplicant On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Jouni Malinen wrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 04:09:01PM +0000, Jose Blanquicet wrote: >> I tried what you suggested and it worked for me: >> >> diff --git a/src/drivers/driver_nl80211.c >> b/src/drivers/driver_nl80211.c index 6080079..5470312 100644 >> --- a/src/drivers/driver_nl80211.c >> +++ b/src/drivers/driver_nl80211.c >> @@ -3783,7 +3783,8 @@ static int wpa_driver_nl80211_set_ap(void *priv, >> beacon_set); >> if (beacon_set) >> cmd = NL80211_CMD_SET_BEACON; >> - else if (!nl80211_get_wiphy_data_ap(bss)) >> + else if (!drv->device_ap_sme && !drv->use_monitor && >> + !nl80211_get_wiphy_data_ap(bss)) >> return -ENOBUFS; >> >> wpa_hexdump(MSG_DEBUG, "nl80211: Beacon head", >> >> What does Jouni think about this solution? > > This looks like the correct thing to do here. > nl80211_get_wiphy_data_ap() used to be called from > nl80211_mgmt_subscribe_ap() and that function is within that same > !device_ap_sme && !use_monitor case. > > Could you please send this patch with a proper commit message and > Signed-off-by: line so that I can apply it? It would not be a problem at all but due to I just followed Lansky's suggestion, I was wondering if maybe he would prefer to do it himself. Lansky, would you? Regards, Jose Blanquicet
On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 11:57:32AM +0000, Lansky, Dedy wrote:
> See attached patch to fix this issue.
Thanks, applied.
diff --git a/src/drivers/driver_nl80211.c b/src/drivers/driver_nl80211.c index 6080079..5470312 100644 --- a/src/drivers/driver_nl80211.c +++ b/src/drivers/driver_nl80211.c @@ -3783,7 +3783,8 @@ static int wpa_driver_nl80211_set_ap(void *priv, beacon_set); if (beacon_set) cmd = NL80211_CMD_SET_BEACON; - else if (!nl80211_get_wiphy_data_ap(bss)) + else if (!drv->device_ap_sme && !drv->use_monitor && + !nl80211_get_wiphy_data_ap(bss)) return -ENOBUFS; wpa_hexdump(MSG_DEBUG, "nl80211: Beacon head",