diff mbox series

posix: Revert the removal of the crypt prototype from <unistd.h>

Message ID 87zfz7gnrs.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com
State New
Headers show
Series posix: Revert the removal of the crypt prototype from <unistd.h> | expand

Commit Message

Florian Weimer Nov. 21, 2023, 2:54 p.m. UTC
Many applications still rely on this prototype.  Rebuilds without
this prototype result in an implicit function declaration, which can
introduce security vulnerabilities due to 32-bit pointer truncation.

---
 NEWS           |  5 ++++-
 posix/unistd.h | 13 +++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)


base-commit: c52c2c32db15aba8bbe1a0b4d3235f97d9c1a525

Comments

Zack Weinberg Nov. 21, 2023, 3:31 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Nov 21, 2023, at 9:54 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Many applications still rely on this prototype.  Rebuilds without this
> prototype result in an implicit function declaration, which can
> introduce security vulnerabilities due to 32-bit pointer truncation.

Did you consider __attribute_deprecated_msg__("include <crypt.h> for the
crypt prototype")?  ...I guess we can't do that if it'd still generate a
deprecation warning when _both_ unistd.h and crypt.h are included (in either
order), though.

Otherwise LGTM.

zw
Florian Weimer Nov. 21, 2023, 3:42 p.m. UTC | #2
* Zack Weinberg:

> On Tue, Nov 21, 2023, at 9:54 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> Many applications still rely on this prototype.  Rebuilds without this
>> prototype result in an implicit function declaration, which can
>> introduce security vulnerabilities due to 32-bit pointer truncation.
>
> Did you consider __attribute_deprecated_msg__("include <crypt.h> for the
> crypt prototype")?  ...I guess we can't do that if it'd still generate a
> deprecation warning when _both_ unistd.h and crypt.h are included (in either
> order), though.

Current GCC produces a warning if <unistd.h> followed by <crypt.h>, with
a note that points towards the non-deprecated declaration.  This is
rather confusing.  In general, attributes are not superseded by
redeclarations.  So I don't think the attribute is an option here.

Thanks,
Florian
Zack Weinberg Nov. 21, 2023, 4:36 p.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, Nov 21, 2023, at 10:42 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Zack Weinberg:
>> On Tue, Nov 21, 2023, at 9:54 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> Many applications still rely on this prototype.  Rebuilds without this
>>> prototype result in an implicit function declaration, which can
>>> introduce security vulnerabilities due to 32-bit pointer truncation.
>>
>> Did you consider __attribute_deprecated_msg__("include <crypt.h> for the
>> crypt prototype")?  ...I guess we can't do that if it'd still generate a
>> deprecation warning when _both_ unistd.h and crypt.h are included (in either
>> order), though.
>
> Current GCC produces a warning if <unistd.h> followed by <crypt.h>, with
> a note that points towards the non-deprecated declaration.

Yeah, I was afraid of that.  Oh well.

zw
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
index 139cfef1b0..8c1c149f91 100644
--- a/NEWS
+++ b/NEWS
@@ -52,7 +52,10 @@  Deprecated and removed features, and other changes affecting compatibility:
 * libcrypt has been removed from the GNU C Library.  The configure
   options "--enable-crypt" and "--enable-nss-crypt" are no longer
   available.  <crypt.h>, libcrypt.a, and libcrypt.so.1 will not be
-  installed, and <unistd.h> will not declare the crypt function.
+  installed.  For now <unistd.h> continues to declare the crypt
+  function by default, to avoid introducing vulnerabilities into
+  existing applications due to a missing prototype.  This declaration
+  is deprecated and may be removed in a future glibc release.
 
   The replacement for libcrypt is libxcrypt, maintained separately from
   GNU libc, but available under compatible licensing terms, and providing
diff --git a/posix/unistd.h b/posix/unistd.h
index 1f9cd8cbf0..5b91ad4aaa 100644
--- a/posix/unistd.h
+++ b/posix/unistd.h
@@ -1150,6 +1150,19 @@  ssize_t copy_file_range (int __infd, __off64_t *__pinoff,
 extern int fdatasync (int __fildes);
 #endif /* Use POSIX199309 */
 
+#ifdef __USE_MISC
+/* One-way hash PHRASE, returning a string suitable for storage in the
+   user database.  SALT selects the one-way function to use, and
+   ensures that no two users' hashes are the same, even if they use
+   the same passphrase.  The return value points to static storage
+   which will be overwritten by the next call to crypt.
+
+   This declaration is deprecated; applications should include
+   <crypt.h> instead.  */
+extern char *crypt (const char *__key, const char *__salt)
+     __THROW __nonnull ((1, 2));
+#endif
+
 #ifdef	__USE_XOPEN
 /* Swab pairs bytes in the first N bytes of the area pointed to by
    FROM and copy the result to TO.  The value of TO must not be in the