diff mbox series

[v5,03/30] arm64: signal: Verify extra data is user-readable in sys_rt_sigreturn

Message ID 1509465082-30427-4-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com
State New
Headers show
Series [v5,01/30] regset: Add support for dynamically sized regsets | expand

Commit Message

Dave Martin Oct. 31, 2017, 3:50 p.m. UTC
Currently sys_rt_sigreturn() verifies that the base sigframe is
readable, but no similar check is performed on the extra data to
which an extra_context record points.

This matters because the extra data will be read with the
unprotected user accessors.  However, this is not a problem at
present because the extra data base address is required to be
exactly at the end of the base sigframe.  So, there would need to
be a non-user-readable kernel address within about 59K
(SIGFRAME_MAXSZ - sizeof(struct rt_sigframe)) of some address for
which access_ok(VERIFY_READ) returns true, in order for sigreturn
to be able to read kernel memory that should be inaccessible to the
user task.  This is currently impossible due to the untranslatable
address hole between the TTBR0 and TTBR1 address ranges.

Disappearance of the hole between the TTBR0 and TTBR1 mapping
ranges would require the VA size for TTBR0 and TTBR1 to grow to at
least 55 bits, and either the disabling of tagged pointers for
userspace or enabling of tagged pointers for kernel space; none of
which is currently envisaged.

Even so, it is wrong to use the unprotected user accessors without
an accompanying access_ok() check.

To avoid the potential for future surprises, this patch does an
explicit access_ok() check on the extra data space when parsing an
extra_context record.

Fixes: 33f082614c34 ("arm64: signal: Allow expansion of the signal frame")
Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

Comments

Catalin Marinas Nov. 1, 2017, 11:43 a.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 03:50:55PM +0000, Dave P Martin wrote:
> Currently sys_rt_sigreturn() verifies that the base sigframe is
> readable, but no similar check is performed on the extra data to
> which an extra_context record points.
> 
> This matters because the extra data will be read with the
> unprotected user accessors.  However, this is not a problem at
> present because the extra data base address is required to be
> exactly at the end of the base sigframe.  So, there would need to
> be a non-user-readable kernel address within about 59K
> (SIGFRAME_MAXSZ - sizeof(struct rt_sigframe)) of some address for
> which access_ok(VERIFY_READ) returns true, in order for sigreturn
> to be able to read kernel memory that should be inaccessible to the
> user task.  This is currently impossible due to the untranslatable
> address hole between the TTBR0 and TTBR1 address ranges.
> 
> Disappearance of the hole between the TTBR0 and TTBR1 mapping
> ranges would require the VA size for TTBR0 and TTBR1 to grow to at
> least 55 bits, and either the disabling of tagged pointers for
> userspace or enabling of tagged pointers for kernel space; none of
> which is currently envisaged.
> 
> Even so, it is wrong to use the unprotected user accessors without
> an accompanying access_ok() check.
> 
> To avoid the potential for future surprises, this patch does an
> explicit access_ok() check on the extra data space when parsing an
> extra_context record.
> 
> Fixes: 33f082614c34 ("arm64: signal: Allow expansion of the signal frame")
> Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>

Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
index 0bdc96c..4716729 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
@@ -343,6 +343,10 @@  static int parse_user_sigframe(struct user_ctxs *user,
 			 */
 			offset = 0;
 			limit = extra_size;
+
+			if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, base, limit))
+				goto invalid;
+
 			continue;
 
 		default: