Add Phillipines peso symbol to translit_neutral

Fixes
usr/share/i18n/locales/tl_PH:87: LC_MONETARY: unknown character in field `currency_symbol’

Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
---
 localedata/ChangeLog                | 4 ++++
 localedata/locales/translit_neutral | 2 ++
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)

* Khem Raj:

> Fixes
> usr/share/i18n/locales/tl_PH:87: LC_MONETARY: unknown character in field `currency_symbol’

Why does this fix the bug?

> +% PHILIPPINES PESO SIGN
> +<U20B1> "<U0050><U0068><U0050>"

Is this the correct transliteration?  It is not listed in Unicode.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippine_peso_sign

see encoding section

On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> wrote:
> * Khem Raj:
>
>> Fixes
>> usr/share/i18n/locales/tl_PH:87: LC_MONETARY: unknown character in field `currency_symbol’
>
> Why does this fix the bug?
>
>> +% PHILIPPINES PESO SIGN
>> +<U20B1> "<U0050><U0068><U0050>"
>
> Is this the correct transliteration?  It is not listed in Unicode.

On 23 Apr 2016 19:59, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Khem Raj:
> > Fixes
> > usr/share/i18n/locales/tl_PH:87: LC_MONETARY: unknown character in field `currency_symbol’
> 
> Why does this fix the bug?

he didn't mention the encoding ... this is ISO-8859-1.  so the translit
changes it from the unicode/utf-8 ₱ to PHP as the former can't be encoded.

(i'm sure you know much of this already ... just trying to avoid anymore
confusion due to missing/assumed info)

> > +% PHILIPPINES PESO SIGN
> > +<U20B1> "<U0050><U0068><U0050>"
> 
> Is this the correct transliteration?  It is not listed in Unicode.

it is, the same as £ & ¥ -- just use the currency code in place of the
symbol.  where in the standard are you finding the definition for the
translit_neutral file ?  it doesn't seem to be handled by unicode-gen/
(yet?).  there's more symbols we need to add ...
-mike

* Mike Frysinger:

>> Is this the correct transliteration?  It is not listed in Unicode.
>
> it is, the same as £ & ¥ -- just use the currency code in place of the
> symbol.  where in the standard are you finding the definition for the
> translit_neutral file ?

Unicode sometimes give transliterations, but not in this case.  I
assume because the correct transliteration is locale-dependent.  If
you translate to the currency code, there are multiple choices for ¥
(for Japanese Yen and Chinese Yuan) and perhaps ₱ (as this was used in
other countries, not just the Philippines).  £ may also have been used
for Italian Lire.

On 23 Apr 2016 22:15, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Mike Frysinger:
> >> Is this the correct transliteration?  It is not listed in Unicode.
> >
> > it is, the same as £ & ¥ -- just use the currency code in place of the
> > symbol.  where in the standard are you finding the definition for the
> > translit_neutral file ?
> 
> Unicode sometimes give transliterations, but not in this case.  I
> assume because the correct transliteration is locale-dependent.  If
> you translate to the currency code, there are multiple choices for ¥
> (for Japanese Yen and Chinese Yuan) and perhaps ₱ (as this was used in
> other countries, not just the Philippines).  £ may also have been used
> for Italian Lire.

but we've made a choice already for ¥ & £ in this file:
% POUND SIGN
<U00A3> "<U0047><U0042><U0050>"
% YEN SIGN
<U00A5> "<U004A><U0050><U0059>"

Unicode has given a diff codepoint for the Lira: <U20A4>.  although they
did use £ in the past, and people might still (since it's more common on
keyboards).

you're right that the Yen-vs-Renminbi is not unambiguous, and considering
the way the Unicode consortium has treated CJK in the past (just see the
misguided "Han Unification" strategy), i don't expect this to change.  we
can pick an obvious "winner" for some locales (like zh_* & ja_*), but what
about common ones like en_US ?  do we leave ¥ unmapped ?

while you're right that other countries have used "the peso", have any
used the ₱ symbol ?  mexico for instance has used $ instead.
-mike