| Message ID | trinity-9b4c6cb0-46c8-4cba-85e2-34d09331031a-1623785468371@3c-app-gmx-bap21 |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | PR fortran/101084 - [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_typenode_for_spec, at fortran/trans-types.c:1124 | expand |
*Ping* > Gesendet: Dienstag, 15. Juni 2021 um 21:31 Uhr > Von: "Harald Anlauf" <anlauf@gmx.de> > An: "fortran" <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>, "gcc-patches" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> > Betreff: [PATCH] PR fortran/101084 - [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_typenode_for_spec, at fortran/trans-types.c:1124 > > A recent change to the checking of legacy FORMAT tags did not handle > cases where the type is not set. Adjust the check. > > Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. > > OK for mainline / 11- / 10-branch? > > Thanks, > Harald > > > Fortran: reject FORMAT tag of unknown type. > > gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: > > PR fortran/101084 > * io.c (resolve_tag_format): Extend FORMAT check to unknown type. > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > PR fortran/101084 > * gfortran.dg/fmt_nonchar_3.f90: New test. > >
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/io.c b/gcc/fortran/io.c index 40cd76eb585..fc97df79eca 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/io.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/io.c @@ -1763,7 +1763,7 @@ resolve_tag_format (gfc_expr *e) if (e->ts.type != BT_CHARACTER) { if (e->ts.type == BT_DERIVED || e->ts.type == BT_CLASS - || e->ts.type == BT_VOID) + || e->ts.type == BT_VOID || e->ts.type == BT_UNKNOWN) { gfc_error ("Non-character non-Hollerith in FORMAT tag at %L", &e->where); diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/fmt_nonchar_3.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/fmt_nonchar_3.f90 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3b3c260ef7f --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/fmt_nonchar_3.f90 @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +! { dg-do compile } +! PR fortran/101084 + +program p + integer, parameter :: a(0) = 1 + print int(a) ! { dg-error "Non-character non-Hollerith in FORMAT tag" } +end