| Message ID | fdf57279-641b-fa8d-ffaf-5108bb190d05@foss.arm.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/fpscr.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/fpscr.c index 7b4d71d72d8964f6da0d0604bf59aeb4a895df43..cafba4e8d67545bd210477230b9682fe86620e23 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/fpscr.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/fpscr.c @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ /* Test the fpscr builtins. */ /* { dg-do compile } */ -/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_fp_ok } */ +/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_vfp_ok } */ /* { dg-skip-if "need fp instructions" { *-*-* } { "-mfloat-abi=soft" } { "" } } */ -/* { dg-add-options arm_fp } */ +/* { dg-options "-mfpu=vfp -mfloat-abi=softfp" } */ void test_fpscr ()
Hi, As raised by Christophe Lyon, fpscr.c FAILs because arm_fp_ok and arm_fp are not defined in GCC 5. This commit changes the test to use the same recipe as gcc.target/arm/cmp-2.c ChangeLog entry is as follows: *** gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog *** 2017-06-26 Thomas Preud'homme <thomas.preudhomme@arm.com> * gcc.target/arm/fpscr.c: Require arm_vfp_ok instead of arm_fp_ok and add -mfpu=vfp -mfloat-abi=softfp instead of fp_ok options. Ok for GCC 5? Best regards, Thomas