From patchwork Thu Feb 16 17:47:49 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Thomas Preudhomme X-Patchwork-Id: 728852 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3vPNsv4rFXz9s72 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 04:48:03 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gcc.gnu.org header.i=@gcc.gnu.org header.b="bTgG05v0"; dkim-atps=neutral DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender :subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=aJrwj6FxsXOYjR68h lh0uYQHsqnEHrMXIw1RgAcMkKrGhSQoxOi+UDBnicHN6zF21/4DTXlElDN4DgM8/ S3MPlU2w/APsn8ev7NTRY1rV61oKjaWVmmE64nsc2Kpn67Eq2rIVZ3B2iyYrxdbj V1GpeSAq2b7RbGFeUvRcZAXTpY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender :subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type; s=default; bh=mAEwjaEeIt05r4Roqrhc91I PitY=; b=bTgG05v0U/st53UC6VFQtlPkbkDso5HdjtN5iIUnjd7YCuKLDjubdji Q9UhMjuxelLKfMVIlsfGIpJRNhm9jhUHlnTvqWti07eSRiNJYDTNolEkZ9+BFQ8g Lhz3iv6y1G1oPFCobCtncc7HyvKIArrp/WPN1wO7z9MxAITH5GvQ= Received: (qmail 49076 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2017 17:47:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 49057 invoked by uid 89); 16 Feb 2017 17:47:54 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-10.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, GIT_PATCH_2, GIT_PATCH_3, KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=HX-Envelope-From:sk:thomas., Best, friend X-HELO: foss.arm.com Received: from foss.arm.com (HELO foss.arm.com) (217.140.101.70) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 17:47:53 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 533B8344; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 09:47:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.2.206.52] (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 937E43F23B; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 09:47:50 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH, wwwdocs/ARM] Deprecate ARMv5 and ARMv5E support To: "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" , Kyrill Tkachov , Ramana Radhakrishnan , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" References: <9af0f20c-f4a6-484d-4bf9-39d823bd72c3@foss.arm.com> From: Thomas Preudhomme Message-ID: Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 17:47:49 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-IsSubscribed: yes Thanks. Committed with the mentioned change. Patch in attachment for reference. Best regards, Thomas On 15/02/17 11:26, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > On 15/02/17 11:23, Thomas Preudhomme wrote: >> Hi, >> >> ARMv5 and ARMv5E architectures have no known implementation. I therefore >> suggest that we deprecate these architectures. ARMv5T, ARMv5TE and >> ARMv5TEJ would remain supported though. >> >> Is this ok to commit? >> >> Best regards, >> >> Thomas >> >> deprecate_armv5_armv5e.patch >> >> >> cvs diff: Diffing . >> cvs diff: Diffing benchmarks >> cvs diff: Diffing bugs > > "cvs -q diff" is your friend :-) > >> Index: gcc-7/changes.html >> =================================================================== >> RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-7/changes.html,v >> retrieving revision 1.55 >> diff -u -r1.55 changes.html >> --- gcc-7/changes.html 2 Feb 2017 15:21:11 -0000 1.55 >> +++ gcc-7/changes.html 14 Feb 2017 09:21:23 -0000 >> @@ -752,6 +752,13 @@ >>

ARM

>>
    >>
  • >> + Support for the ARMv5 and ARMv5E architectures has been deprecated and > > Suggest "Support for the ARMv5 and ARMv5E architectures (which have no > known implementations) has been ..." > >> + will be removed in a future GCC release. Note that ARMv5T, ARMv5TE and >> + ARMv5TEJ architectures remain supported. >> + The values armv5 and armv5e of >> + -march are thus deprecated. >> +
    • >> +
  • >> The ARMv8.2-A architecture and the ARMv8.2-A 16-bit Floating-Point >> Extensions are now supported. They can be used by specifying the >> -march=armv8.2-a or -march=armv8.2-a+fp16 > > Otherwise OK. > > R. > Index: htdocs/gcc-7/changes.html =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-7/changes.html,v retrieving revision 1.55 diff -u -r1.55 changes.html --- htdocs/gcc-7/changes.html 2 Feb 2017 15:21:11 -0000 1.55 +++ htdocs/gcc-7/changes.html 15 Feb 2017 11:35:49 -0000 @@ -752,6 +752,14 @@

    ARM

    • + Support for the ARMv5 and ARMv5E architectures has been deprecated + (which have no known implementations) and will be removed in a future + GCC release. Note that ARMv5T, ARMv5TE and ARMv5TEJ architectures + remain supported. + The values armv5 and armv5e of + -march are thus deprecated. +
      • +
    • The ARMv8.2-A architecture and the ARMv8.2-A 16-bit Floating-Point Extensions are now supported. They can be used by specifying the -march=armv8.2-a or -march=armv8.2-a+fp16