| Message ID | bb6a45366c1c1cc8a317c9bd7a58d4f6d3b74615.1697866322.git.research_trasio@irq.a4lg.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | RISC-V: 'Zfa' extension is now ratified | expand |
On 10/20/23 23:32, Tsukasa OI wrote: > From: Tsukasa OI <research_trasio@irq.a4lg.com> > > Since this extension is ratified, it now has the version number 1.0. > > Reference: > <https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/pull/1096> > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > * common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc (riscv_ext_version_table): > Change version number of the 'Zfa' extension to 1.0. Note that it should be standard practice to run a build & regression test for every change. However, I don't think anything in GCC actually cares about the version number of the specs. So I'll ACK without the usual testing. OK for the trunk. jeff
diff --git a/gcc/common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc b/gcc/common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc index d7216285c648..860c8521b7b6 100644 --- a/gcc/common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc +++ b/gcc/common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc @@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ static const struct riscv_ext_version riscv_ext_version_table[] = {"zvfhmin", ISA_SPEC_CLASS_NONE, 1, 0}, {"zvfh", ISA_SPEC_CLASS_NONE, 1, 0}, - {"zfa", ISA_SPEC_CLASS_NONE, 0, 1}, + {"zfa", ISA_SPEC_CLASS_NONE, 1, 0}, {"zmmul", ISA_SPEC_CLASS_NONE, 1, 0},
From: Tsukasa OI <research_trasio@irq.a4lg.com> Since this extension is ratified, it now has the version number 1.0. Reference: <https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/pull/1096> gcc/ChangeLog: * common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc (riscv_ext_version_table): Change version number of the 'Zfa' extension to 1.0. --- gcc/common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) base-commit: 66c26e5cfdf65ae024fcb658629dc5a9a10f3f85