diff mbox

[doc] Omit up pointer (DIR) in gcc.texi and gccint.texi?

Message ID alpine.LSU.2.20.1703112200160.3498@anthias.pfeifer.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Gerald Pfeifer March 11, 2017, 9:06 p.m. UTC 
Joseph, Sandra,

I am thinking about the patch below; what do you think?

(If we retain this, I believe it should at least be "(dir)" as
opposed to "(DIR)"?)

Gerald

2017-03-11  Gerald Pfeifer  <gerald@pfeifer.com>

	* doc/gcc.texi (Top): Omit up pointer (DIR).
	* doc/gccint.texi (Top): Ditto.

Comments

Joseph Myers March 13, 2017, 6:46 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Sat, 11 Mar 2017, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:

> Joseph, Sandra,
> 
> I am thinking about the patch below; what do you think?

I think that as far as possible we should just use "@node node-name" 
without any of the subsequent arguments pointing to other nodes.
diff mbox

Patch

Index: doc/gcc.texi
===================================================================
--- doc/gcc.texi	(revision 245903)
+++ doc/gcc.texi	(working copy)
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ 
 @contents
 @page
 
-@node Top, G++ and GCC,, (DIR)
+@node Top, G++ and GCC
 @top Introduction
 @cindex introduction
 
Index: doc/gccint.texi
===================================================================
--- doc/gccint.texi	(revision 245903)
+++ doc/gccint.texi	(working copy)
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ 
 @contents
 @page
 
-@node Top, Contributing,, (DIR)
+@node Top, Contributing
 @top Introduction
 @cindex introduction