From patchwork Sat Feb 25 21:15:32 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Gerald Pfeifer X-Patchwork-Id: 732447 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3vW13Y0HCpz9s82 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 08:15:52 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gcc.gnu.org header.i=@gcc.gnu.org header.b="nrKf6BQT"; dkim-atps=neutral DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender:date :from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=xjv38D9mzTPxoW/Z i7eXk2H7Droxw9W/lBodiw9rB2fDd8BCrLVpkjT3EioxUeNfe2qvQYU8Em+oaeFN LJQQ0xOtzZYuj5hcB3kBHyr3lr8lP9NhyaRMZIObLzgcC7e1zPB+ziAYQo2de8m9 H06OUpS+fadvIcpiQvVzdZurJ+E= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender:date :from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type; s=default; bh=r/bQoBZg0r7N2egOSBUTJX nDZnE=; b=nrKf6BQTo6ibNJfTnbA5nOhgY6Ws6+DegYWcH45vdxJCuUGS6bT0Fw tySt/QUwo8M133TDcLLzTdlz3FehE/OSzUWOXKps2d3pjM6MmkyUwX23+Wk4HZt9 CKUETj32+QiRThlk05zWBDSAsnOnfE8a+g+M7436qTXnJpKYhujTg= Received: (qmail 51189 invoked by alias); 25 Feb 2017 21:15:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 51132 invoked by uid 89); 25 Feb 2017 21:15:39 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-11.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, GIT_PATCH_2, GIT_PATCH_3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: ainaz.pair.com Received: from ainaz.pair.com (HELO ainaz.pair.com) (209.68.2.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Feb 2017 21:15:37 +0000 Received: from anthias (vie-188-118-249-200.dsl.sil.at [188.118.249.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 90C753F5E3; Sat, 25 Feb 2017 16:15:35 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2017 22:15:32 +0100 (CET) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Andrew Senkevich cc: Uros Bizjak , Richard Biener , "H.J. Lu" , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove x86 pcommit instruction In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-IsSubscribed: yes On Sat, 25 Feb 2017, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > And here is what I applied for GCC 5. Except that I fixed some things, but failed to remove the duplicate id. Applied as a follow-up. Gerald Index: gcc-5/changes.html =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-5/changes.html,v retrieving revision 1.144 diff -u -r1.144 changes.html --- gcc-5/changes.html 25 Feb 2017 20:52:55 -0000 1.144 +++ gcc-5/changes.html 25 Feb 2017 21:14:09 -0000 @@ -1079,7 +1079,7 @@

Target Specific Changes

-

IA-32/x86-64

+

IA-32/x86-64