diff mbox

[C++] Annotate more functions with MEM-STATs

Message ID alpine.LSU.2.20.1702171240160.8538@zhemvz.fhfr.qr
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Richard Biener Feb. 17, 2017, 11:51 a.m. UTC
The following annotates two key wrappers around copy_node in the C++ FE
with MEM-STAT info (and with CXX_MEM_STAT_INFO this is surprisingly
easy, without adding _stat variants and macros as we have for the classic
way from the pre-C++ era).

It also annotates more type building functions in tree.c (all in the 
attempt to get a better idea on where all the types are built for C++
sources).

Bootstrapped without --enable-gather-detailed-mem-stats, bootstrapped
with --enable-gather-detailed-mem-stats and visually inspected the
improved stats on some example C++ code.

There are still some more functions worth annotating:

tree.c:8239 (build_range_type_1)                        840:  0.0%    
666120:  3.2%
tree.c:8362 (build_array_type_1)                       3024:  0.0%    
671496:  3.2%
tree.c:4841 (build_type_attribute_qual_variant)       13776:  0.1%     
67032:  0.3%
tree.c:8681 (build_method_type_directly)              41832:  0.3%    
202944:  1.0%
hash-table.h:736 (expand)                             15136:  0.1%   
5826600: 27.8%
tree.c:8532 (build_function_type)                    148344:  1.1%   
3538080: 16.9%
cp/lex.c:556 (retrofit_lang_decl)                     78628:  0.6%     
43776:  0.2%
cp/lex.c:526 (build_lang_decl_loc)                    87968:  0.6%    
260776:  1.2%   3902184:  7.5%    536840: 23.8%     15444

is it ok if I go forward with this (at this stage, also for C++
specifics above?)

Would it be welcome to scrap _stat and the macro wrappings everywhere
at this stage?

Thanks,
Richard.

2017-02-17  Richard Biener  <rguenther@suse.de>

	* tree.h (build_qualified_type): Annotate with CXX_MEM_STAT_INFO.
	(build_distinct_type_copy): Likewise.
	(build_variant_type_copy): Likewise.
	* tree.c (build_qualified_type): Pass down mem-stat info.
	(build_distinct_type_copy): Likewise.
	(build_variant_type_copy): Likewise.

	cp/
	* cp-tree.h (copy_decl): Annotate with CXX_MEM_STAT_INFO.
	(copy_type): Likewise.
	* lex.c (copy_decl): Pass down mem-stat info.
	(copy_type): Likewise.

Comments

Richard Biener Feb. 17, 2017, 12:22 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, 17 Feb 2017, Richard Biener wrote:

> 
> The following annotates two key wrappers around copy_node in the C++ FE
> with MEM-STAT info (and with CXX_MEM_STAT_INFO this is surprisingly
> easy, without adding _stat variants and macros as we have for the classic
> way from the pre-C++ era).
> 
> It also annotates more type building functions in tree.c (all in the 
> attempt to get a better idea on where all the types are built for C++
> sources).
> 
> Bootstrapped without --enable-gather-detailed-mem-stats, bootstrapped
> with --enable-gather-detailed-mem-stats and visually inspected the
> improved stats on some example C++ code.
> 
> There are still some more functions worth annotating:
> 
> tree.c:8239 (build_range_type_1)                        840:  0.0%    
> 666120:  3.2%
> tree.c:8362 (build_array_type_1)                       3024:  0.0%    
> 671496:  3.2%
> tree.c:4841 (build_type_attribute_qual_variant)       13776:  0.1%     
> 67032:  0.3%
> tree.c:8681 (build_method_type_directly)              41832:  0.3%    
> 202944:  1.0%
> hash-table.h:736 (expand)                             15136:  0.1%   
> 5826600: 27.8%
> tree.c:8532 (build_function_type)                    148344:  1.1%   
> 3538080: 16.9%
> cp/lex.c:556 (retrofit_lang_decl)                     78628:  0.6%     
> 43776:  0.2%
> cp/lex.c:526 (build_lang_decl_loc)                    87968:  0.6%    
> 260776:  1.2%   3902184:  7.5%    536840: 23.8%     15444
> 
> is it ok if I go forward with this (at this stage, also for C++
> specifics above?)
> 
> Would it be welcome to scrap _stat and the macro wrappings everywhere
> at this stage?

And even unify CXX_MEM_STAT_INFO and MEM_STAT_INFO, also dropping support
for host compilers < GCC 4.8, GCC 4.8 introduced __builtin_FILE and
friends (you'd have to bootstrap with older host compilers or clang
which doesn't seem to support those either and still claims to be
GCC 4.2.1 ...).

Richard.

> Thanks,
> Richard.
> 
> 2017-02-17  Richard Biener  <rguenther@suse.de>
> 
> 	* tree.h (build_qualified_type): Annotate with CXX_MEM_STAT_INFO.
> 	(build_distinct_type_copy): Likewise.
> 	(build_variant_type_copy): Likewise.
> 	* tree.c (build_qualified_type): Pass down mem-stat info.
> 	(build_distinct_type_copy): Likewise.
> 	(build_variant_type_copy): Likewise.
> 
> 	cp/
> 	* cp-tree.h (copy_decl): Annotate with CXX_MEM_STAT_INFO.
> 	(copy_type): Likewise.
> 	* lex.c (copy_decl): Pass down mem-stat info.
> 	(copy_type): Likewise.
> 
> Index: gcc/tree.h
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc/tree.h	(revision 245526)
> +++ gcc/tree.h	(working copy)
> @@ -4258,7 +4258,7 @@ extern tree get_qualified_type (tree, in
>  /* Like get_qualified_type, but creates the type if it does not
>     exist.  This function never returns NULL_TREE.  */
>  
> -extern tree build_qualified_type (tree, int);
> +extern tree build_qualified_type (tree, int CXX_MEM_STAT_INFO);
>  
>  /* Create a variant of type T with alignment ALIGN.  */
>  
> @@ -4276,8 +4276,8 @@ extern tree build_aligned_type (tree, un
>  
>  /* Make a copy of a type node.  */
>  
> -extern tree build_distinct_type_copy (tree);
> -extern tree build_variant_type_copy (tree);
> +extern tree build_distinct_type_copy (tree CXX_MEM_STAT_INFO);
> +extern tree build_variant_type_copy (tree CXX_MEM_STAT_INFO);
>  
>  /* Given a hashcode and a ..._TYPE node (for which the hashcode was made),
>     return a canonicalized ..._TYPE node, so that duplicates are not made.
> Index: gcc/tree.c
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc/tree.c	(revision 245526)
> +++ gcc/tree.c	(working copy)
> @@ -6622,7 +6622,7 @@ get_qualified_type (tree type, int type_
>     exist.  This function never returns NULL_TREE.  */
>  
>  tree
> -build_qualified_type (tree type, int type_quals)
> +build_qualified_type (tree type, int type_quals MEM_STAT_DECL)
>  {
>    tree t;
>  
> @@ -6632,7 +6632,7 @@ build_qualified_type (tree type, int typ
>    /* If not, build it.  */
>    if (!t)
>      {
> -      t = build_variant_type_copy (type);
> +      t = build_variant_type_copy (type PASS_MEM_STAT);
>        set_type_quals (t, type_quals);
>  
>        if (((type_quals & TYPE_QUAL_ATOMIC) == TYPE_QUAL_ATOMIC))
> @@ -6695,9 +6695,9 @@ build_aligned_type (tree type, unsigned
>     TYPE_CANONICAL points to itself. */
>  
>  tree
> -build_distinct_type_copy (tree type)
> +build_distinct_type_copy (tree type MEM_STAT_DECL)
>  {
> -  tree t = copy_node (type);
> +  tree t = copy_node_stat (type PASS_MEM_STAT);
>  
>    TYPE_POINTER_TO (t) = 0;
>    TYPE_REFERENCE_TO (t) = 0;
> @@ -6733,11 +6733,11 @@ build_distinct_type_copy (tree type)
>     require structural equality checks). */
>  
>  tree
> -build_variant_type_copy (tree type)
> +build_variant_type_copy (tree type MEM_STAT_DECL)
>  {
>    tree t, m = TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (type);
>  
> -  t = build_distinct_type_copy (type);
> +  t = build_distinct_type_copy (type PASS_MEM_STAT);
>  
>    /* Since we're building a variant, assume that it is a non-semantic
>       variant. This also propagates TYPE_STRUCTURAL_EQUALITY_P. */
> Index: gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc/cp/cp-tree.h	(revision 245526)
> +++ gcc/cp/cp-tree.h	(working copy)
> @@ -6080,8 +6080,8 @@ extern tree unqualified_fn_lookup_error
>  extern tree build_lang_decl			(enum tree_code, tree, tree);
>  extern tree build_lang_decl_loc			(location_t, enum tree_code, tree, tree);
>  extern void retrofit_lang_decl			(tree);
> -extern tree copy_decl				(tree);
> -extern tree copy_type				(tree);
> +extern tree copy_decl				(tree CXX_MEM_STAT_INFO);
> +extern tree copy_type				(tree CXX_MEM_STAT_INFO);
>  extern tree cxx_make_type			(enum tree_code);
>  extern tree make_class_type			(enum tree_code);
>  extern bool cxx_init				(void);
> Index: gcc/cp/lex.c
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc/cp/lex.c	(revision 245526)
> +++ gcc/cp/lex.c	(working copy)
> @@ -607,11 +607,11 @@ cxx_dup_lang_specific_decl (tree node)
>  /* Copy DECL, including any language-specific parts.  */
>  
>  tree
> -copy_decl (tree decl)
> +copy_decl (tree decl MEM_STAT_DECL)
>  {
>    tree copy;
>  
> -  copy = copy_node (decl);
> +  copy = copy_node_stat (decl PASS_MEM_STAT);
>    cxx_dup_lang_specific_decl (copy);
>    return copy;
>  }
> @@ -645,11 +645,11 @@ copy_lang_type (tree node)
>  /* Copy TYPE, including any language-specific parts.  */
>  
>  tree
> -copy_type (tree type)
> +copy_type (tree type MEM_STAT_DECL)
>  {
>    tree copy;
>  
> -  copy = copy_node (type);
> +  copy = copy_node_stat (type PASS_MEM_STAT);
>    copy_lang_type (copy);
>    return copy;
>  }
>
Jakub Jelinek Feb. 17, 2017, 12:27 p.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 01:22:57PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> And even unify CXX_MEM_STAT_INFO and MEM_STAT_INFO, also dropping support
> for host compilers < GCC 4.8, GCC 4.8 introduced __builtin_FILE and
> friends (you'd have to bootstrap with older host compilers or clang
> which doesn't seem to support those either and still claims to be
> GCC 4.2.1 ...).

Do you mean drop support for host < GCC 4.8 if detailed mem stats gathering
is requested, or dropping support for such host compilers altogether?
I have no problem with the former, big problem with the latter.

	Jakub
Richard Biener Feb. 17, 2017, 12:30 p.m. UTC | #3
On Fri, 17 Feb 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 01:22:57PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > And even unify CXX_MEM_STAT_INFO and MEM_STAT_INFO, also dropping support
> > for host compilers < GCC 4.8, GCC 4.8 introduced __builtin_FILE and
> > friends (you'd have to bootstrap with older host compilers or clang
> > which doesn't seem to support those either and still claims to be
> > GCC 4.2.1 ...).
> 
> Do you mean drop support for host < GCC 4.8 if detailed mem stats gathering
> is requested, or dropping support for such host compilers altogether?
> I have no problem with the former, big problem with the latter.

The former, and it would just make stage1 more-or-less behave as if
detailed mem stats gathering would be disabled (with a simple-minded
approach GATHER_STATISTICS would still be 1 but all MEM_STAT_DECL, etc.
would expand to nothing, thus require __builtin_FILE () support).

Richard.
Jason Merrill Feb. 18, 2017, 2:45 a.m. UTC | #4
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 6:51 AM, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> wrote:
>
> The following annotates two key wrappers around copy_node in the C++ FE
> with MEM-STAT info (and with CXX_MEM_STAT_INFO this is surprisingly
> easy, without adding _stat variants and macros as we have for the classic
> way from the pre-C++ era).
>
> It also annotates more type building functions in tree.c (all in the
> attempt to get a better idea on where all the types are built for C++
> sources).
>
> Bootstrapped without --enable-gather-detailed-mem-stats, bootstrapped
> with --enable-gather-detailed-mem-stats and visually inspected the
> improved stats on some example C++ code.
>
> There are still some more functions worth annotating:
>
> tree.c:8239 (build_range_type_1)                        840:  0.0%
> 666120:  3.2%
> tree.c:8362 (build_array_type_1)                       3024:  0.0%
> 671496:  3.2%
> tree.c:4841 (build_type_attribute_qual_variant)       13776:  0.1%
> 67032:  0.3%
> tree.c:8681 (build_method_type_directly)              41832:  0.3%
> 202944:  1.0%
> hash-table.h:736 (expand)                             15136:  0.1%
> 5826600: 27.8%
> tree.c:8532 (build_function_type)                    148344:  1.1%
> 3538080: 16.9%
> cp/lex.c:556 (retrofit_lang_decl)                     78628:  0.6%
> 43776:  0.2%
> cp/lex.c:526 (build_lang_decl_loc)                    87968:  0.6%
> 260776:  1.2%   3902184:  7.5%    536840: 23.8%     15444
>
> is it ok if I go forward with this (at this stage, also for C++
> specifics above?)
>
> Would it be welcome to scrap _stat and the macro wrappings everywhere
> at this stage?

The patch looks fine to me, I don't have an opinion about
appropriateness for this stage.

Jason
Richard Biener April 21, 2017, 8:59 a.m. UTC | #5
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 3:45 AM, Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 6:51 AM, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> wrote:
>>
>> The following annotates two key wrappers around copy_node in the C++ FE
>> with MEM-STAT info (and with CXX_MEM_STAT_INFO this is surprisingly
>> easy, without adding _stat variants and macros as we have for the classic
>> way from the pre-C++ era).
>>
>> It also annotates more type building functions in tree.c (all in the
>> attempt to get a better idea on where all the types are built for C++
>> sources).
>>
>> Bootstrapped without --enable-gather-detailed-mem-stats, bootstrapped
>> with --enable-gather-detailed-mem-stats and visually inspected the
>> improved stats on some example C++ code.
>>
>> There are still some more functions worth annotating:
>>
>> tree.c:8239 (build_range_type_1)                        840:  0.0%
>> 666120:  3.2%
>> tree.c:8362 (build_array_type_1)                       3024:  0.0%
>> 671496:  3.2%
>> tree.c:4841 (build_type_attribute_qual_variant)       13776:  0.1%
>> 67032:  0.3%
>> tree.c:8681 (build_method_type_directly)              41832:  0.3%
>> 202944:  1.0%
>> hash-table.h:736 (expand)                             15136:  0.1%
>> 5826600: 27.8%
>> tree.c:8532 (build_function_type)                    148344:  1.1%
>> 3538080: 16.9%
>> cp/lex.c:556 (retrofit_lang_decl)                     78628:  0.6%
>> 43776:  0.2%
>> cp/lex.c:526 (build_lang_decl_loc)                    87968:  0.6%
>> 260776:  1.2%   3902184:  7.5%    536840: 23.8%     15444
>>
>> is it ok if I go forward with this (at this stage, also for C++
>> specifics above?)
>>
>> Would it be welcome to scrap _stat and the macro wrappings everywhere
>> at this stage?
>
> The patch looks fine to me, I don't have an opinion about
> appropriateness for this stage.

Re-bootstrapped / tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied to trunk.

Richard.

> Jason
diff mbox

Patch

Index: gcc/tree.h
===================================================================
--- gcc/tree.h	(revision 245526)
+++ gcc/tree.h	(working copy)
@@ -4258,7 +4258,7 @@  extern tree get_qualified_type (tree, in
 /* Like get_qualified_type, but creates the type if it does not
    exist.  This function never returns NULL_TREE.  */
 
-extern tree build_qualified_type (tree, int);
+extern tree build_qualified_type (tree, int CXX_MEM_STAT_INFO);
 
 /* Create a variant of type T with alignment ALIGN.  */
 
@@ -4276,8 +4276,8 @@  extern tree build_aligned_type (tree, un
 
 /* Make a copy of a type node.  */
 
-extern tree build_distinct_type_copy (tree);
-extern tree build_variant_type_copy (tree);
+extern tree build_distinct_type_copy (tree CXX_MEM_STAT_INFO);
+extern tree build_variant_type_copy (tree CXX_MEM_STAT_INFO);
 
 /* Given a hashcode and a ..._TYPE node (for which the hashcode was made),
    return a canonicalized ..._TYPE node, so that duplicates are not made.
Index: gcc/tree.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/tree.c	(revision 245526)
+++ gcc/tree.c	(working copy)
@@ -6622,7 +6622,7 @@  get_qualified_type (tree type, int type_
    exist.  This function never returns NULL_TREE.  */
 
 tree
-build_qualified_type (tree type, int type_quals)
+build_qualified_type (tree type, int type_quals MEM_STAT_DECL)
 {
   tree t;
 
@@ -6632,7 +6632,7 @@  build_qualified_type (tree type, int typ
   /* If not, build it.  */
   if (!t)
     {
-      t = build_variant_type_copy (type);
+      t = build_variant_type_copy (type PASS_MEM_STAT);
       set_type_quals (t, type_quals);
 
       if (((type_quals & TYPE_QUAL_ATOMIC) == TYPE_QUAL_ATOMIC))
@@ -6695,9 +6695,9 @@  build_aligned_type (tree type, unsigned
    TYPE_CANONICAL points to itself. */
 
 tree
-build_distinct_type_copy (tree type)
+build_distinct_type_copy (tree type MEM_STAT_DECL)
 {
-  tree t = copy_node (type);
+  tree t = copy_node_stat (type PASS_MEM_STAT);
 
   TYPE_POINTER_TO (t) = 0;
   TYPE_REFERENCE_TO (t) = 0;
@@ -6733,11 +6733,11 @@  build_distinct_type_copy (tree type)
    require structural equality checks). */
 
 tree
-build_variant_type_copy (tree type)
+build_variant_type_copy (tree type MEM_STAT_DECL)
 {
   tree t, m = TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (type);
 
-  t = build_distinct_type_copy (type);
+  t = build_distinct_type_copy (type PASS_MEM_STAT);
 
   /* Since we're building a variant, assume that it is a non-semantic
      variant. This also propagates TYPE_STRUCTURAL_EQUALITY_P. */
Index: gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
===================================================================
--- gcc/cp/cp-tree.h	(revision 245526)
+++ gcc/cp/cp-tree.h	(working copy)
@@ -6080,8 +6080,8 @@  extern tree unqualified_fn_lookup_error
 extern tree build_lang_decl			(enum tree_code, tree, tree);
 extern tree build_lang_decl_loc			(location_t, enum tree_code, tree, tree);
 extern void retrofit_lang_decl			(tree);
-extern tree copy_decl				(tree);
-extern tree copy_type				(tree);
+extern tree copy_decl				(tree CXX_MEM_STAT_INFO);
+extern tree copy_type				(tree CXX_MEM_STAT_INFO);
 extern tree cxx_make_type			(enum tree_code);
 extern tree make_class_type			(enum tree_code);
 extern bool cxx_init				(void);
Index: gcc/cp/lex.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/cp/lex.c	(revision 245526)
+++ gcc/cp/lex.c	(working copy)
@@ -607,11 +607,11 @@  cxx_dup_lang_specific_decl (tree node)
 /* Copy DECL, including any language-specific parts.  */
 
 tree
-copy_decl (tree decl)
+copy_decl (tree decl MEM_STAT_DECL)
 {
   tree copy;
 
-  copy = copy_node (decl);
+  copy = copy_node_stat (decl PASS_MEM_STAT);
   cxx_dup_lang_specific_decl (copy);
   return copy;
 }
@@ -645,11 +645,11 @@  copy_lang_type (tree node)
 /* Copy TYPE, including any language-specific parts.  */
 
 tree
-copy_type (tree type)
+copy_type (tree type MEM_STAT_DECL)
 {
   tree copy;
 
-  copy = copy_node (type);
+  copy = copy_node_stat (type PASS_MEM_STAT);
   copy_lang_type (copy);
   return copy;
 }