| Message ID | alpine.LSU.2.11.1407070016270.30120@tuna.site |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
To quote William Shakespeare: "FALSTAFF ‘Tis not due yet; I would be loath to pay him before his day. What need I be so forward with him that calls not on me? Well, ’tis no matter; honour pricks me on. Yea, but how if honour prick me off when I come on? how then? Can honour set to a leg? no: or an arm? no: or take away the grief of a wound? no. Honour hath no skill in surgery, then? no. What is honour? a word. What is in that word honour? what is that honour? air. A trim reckoning! Who hath it? he that died o’ Wednesday. Doth he feel it? no. Doth he hear it? no. ‘Tis insensible, then. Yea, to the dead. But will it not live with the living? no. Why? detraction will not suffer it. Therefore I’ll none of it. Honour is a mere scutcheon: and so ends my catechism." What can I say more :-) ? Paul On 7 July 2014 00:20, Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> wrote: > On Sat, 8 Mar 2014, Tobias Burnus wrote: >> An update the gfortran.texi's F2003/F2008 status. > > I just made the following change on top. > > > Also, I noticed that you used British English for honour. There are > now five uses of honor in gcc/fortran/* and five uses of honour. In > gcc/doc, and in general, we use American English, and per > > https://gcc.gnu.org/codingconventions.html > > we should use that. > > I did not change this yet, to see whether there is any strong > opposition making things consistent. > > Gerald > > 2014-07-07 Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> > > * gfortran.texi (Fortran 2003 status): Fix grammar. > > Index: gfortran.texi > =================================================================== > --- gfortran.texi (revision 212307) > +++ gfortran.texi (working copy) > @@ -926,7 +926,7 @@ > > @item Minor I/O features: Rounding during formatted output, using of > a decimal comma instead of a decimal point, setting whether a plus sign > -should appear for positive numbers. On system where @code{strtod} honours > +should appear for positive numbers. On systems where @code{strtod} honours > the rounding mode, the rounding mode is also supported for input. > > @item
Index: gfortran.texi =================================================================== --- gfortran.texi (revision 212307) +++ gfortran.texi (working copy) @@ -926,7 +926,7 @@ @item Minor I/O features: Rounding during formatted output, using of a decimal comma instead of a decimal point, setting whether a plus sign -should appear for positive numbers. On system where @code{strtod} honours +should appear for positive numbers. On systems where @code{strtod} honours the rounding mode, the rounding mode is also supported for input. @item
On Sat, 8 Mar 2014, Tobias Burnus wrote: > An update the gfortran.texi's F2003/F2008 status. I just made the following change on top. Also, I noticed that you used British English for honour. There are now five uses of honor in gcc/fortran/* and five uses of honour. In gcc/doc, and in general, we use American English, and per https://gcc.gnu.org/codingconventions.html we should use that. I did not change this yet, to see whether there is any strong opposition making things consistent. Gerald 2014-07-07 Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> * gfortran.texi (Fortran 2003 status): Fix grammar.