From patchwork Mon Feb 7 01:18:38 2011 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Gerald Pfeifer X-Patchwork-Id: 82072 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1B335B7106 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 12:18:48 +1100 (EST) Received: (qmail 12751 invoked by alias); 7 Feb 2011 01:18:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 12743 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Feb 2011 01:18:44 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay00.pair.com (HELO relay00.pair.com) (209.68.5.9) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with SMTP; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 01:18:38 +0000 Received: (qmail 71412 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2011 01:18:34 -0000 Received: from 2.205.204.203 (HELO ip-2-205-204-203.web.vodafone.de) (2.205.204.203) by relay00.pair.com with SMTP; 7 Feb 2011 01:18:34 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 2.205.204.203 Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 02:18:38 +0100 (CET) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: "Joseph S. Myers" cc: kai-gcc@cats.ms, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [wwwdocs] prefetch.html and XScale In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20110204121834.327fe7fb@Portsmouth> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org On Sun, 6 Feb 2011, Joseph S. Myers wrote: >>> ( http://www.intel.com/design/intelxscale/273473.htm January, 2004 ) >> Thanks for the pointer, Kai. Instead of adding this link to the >> rather specific prefetch.html page, I was going to add this to our >> page at http://gcc.gnu.org/readings.html -- until I realized that >> with GCC 4.3 we actually removed explicit support for XScale. > No, we did not. We removed the xscale*-*-* target names because in > general it is problematic to have a proliferation of names for the same > target that config.sub considers canonical rather than mapping down to a > smaller set of canonical names, leaving support for the architecture > through -mcpu=xscale with the arm*-*-* targets. Thanks, Joseph! Based on this, I add this link to the ARM section of the http://gcc.gnu.org/readings.html page. Gerald Index: readings.html =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/readings.html,v retrieving revision 1.210 diff -u -r1.210 readings.html --- readings.html 6 Feb 2011 21:24:40 -0000 1.210 +++ readings.html 7 Feb 2011 01:17:01 -0000 @@ -78,6 +78,8 @@
Manufacturer: Various, by license from ARM
CPUs include: ARM7 and ARM7T series (eg. ARM7TDMI), ARM9 and StrongARM
ARM Documentation +
Intel + XScale Core Developer's Manual
  • AVR