From patchwork Sun Feb 13 23:21:01 2011 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Gerald Pfeifer X-Patchwork-Id: 83022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E0B32B7123 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 10:21:09 +1100 (EST) Received: (qmail 19407 invoked by alias); 13 Feb 2011 23:21:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 19387 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Feb 2011 23:21:05 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay01.pair.com (HELO relay01.pair.com) (209.68.5.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with SMTP; Sun, 13 Feb 2011 23:21:00 +0000 Received: (qmail 99965 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2011 23:20:57 -0000 Received: from 188.118.200.192 (HELO trevally) (188.118.200.192) by relay01.pair.com with SMTP; 13 Feb 2011 23:20:57 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 188.118.200.192 Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 00:21:01 +0100 (CET) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Jonathan Wakely cc: libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [RFA,doc] libstdc++ FAQ and bug reporting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org On Mon, 7 Feb 2011, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > Yes. Thanks for making these improvements. Thanks for looking into this. For the record, this is the version I applied to the GCC 4.5 branch; exactly the same contents, just the markup had changed so I needed to accomodate for that. Gerald 2011-02-13 Gerald Pfeifer * doc/xml/faq.xml: Adjust link to bug database. Remove old item on broken header files. Index: doc/xml/faq.xml =================================================================== --- doc/xml/faq.xml (revision 170111) +++ doc/xml/faq.xml (working copy) @@ -745,7 +745,7 @@ Before reporting a bug, please examine the - bugs database with the + bugs database with the category set to g++. @@ -848,17 +848,9 @@ - If you have found an extremely broken header file which is - causing problems for you, look carefully before submitting a - "high" priority bug report (which you probably - shouldn't do anyhow; see the last paragraph of the page - describing the GCC - bug database). - - - If the headers are in ${prefix}/include/g++-3, or - if the installed library's name looks like - libstdc++-2.10.a or + If you are using headers in + ${prefix}/include/g++-3, or if the installed + library's name looks like libstdc++-2.10.a or libstdc++-libc6-2.10.so, then you are using the old libstdc++-v2 library, which is nonstandard and unmaintained. Do not report problems with -v2 to the -v3