From patchwork Sun Nov 5 18:15:03 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Marc Glisse X-Patchwork-Id: 834395 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=gcc.gnu.org (client-ip=209.132.180.131; helo=sourceware.org; envelope-from=gcc-patches-return-465977-incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gcc.gnu.org header.i=@gcc.gnu.org header.b="LL212jF2"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3yVP5254dvz9s7p for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2017 05:15:44 +1100 (AEDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender:date :from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s= default; b=oGTI1Xg/go4hPGyl2j0f9zBO4lVeegtVsaRmsdpcunnHt3ehfgpHN CamPj34Dr56zqp+MWsAjc1kY6Ayo92s5q1ThWp+z/nmlwrTDzfcIhvEgLtPGYure orUaqkyEiY14oRm5A31c1ydDN0pzF/aj88TBUev7/WLIynuqvincpo= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender:date :from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s= default; bh=BnvZ2TfKOgJAOxddugVJIH2xzYk=; b=LL212jF22A66ptnmlAfv 9XN4Ov4yuRkguD2h9rSFu1o8JGVb4wfRUTh1FlfSCXvOVL9UjUS7AQqIaOxFh9LB UjEiZAH/TY/c5f/UkTtsIKYLGKzweJgxWdPT4nCZp/lBwb1Tpz79opSx6B7aQJAS Fllr9wSlF8/OfP21fhYI4Cs= Received: (qmail 69145 invoked by alias); 5 Nov 2017 18:15:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 69038 invoked by uid 89); 5 Nov 2017 18:15:24 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-10.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, GIT_PATCH_2, GIT_PATCH_3, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:986, stale X-HELO: mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (HELO mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr) (192.134.164.83) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Nov 2017 18:15:14 +0000 Received: from ip-195.net-89-2-234.rev.numericable.fr (HELO stedding) ([89.2.234.195]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Nov 2017 19:15:03 +0100 Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2017 19:15:03 +0100 (CET) From: Marc Glisse To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Update comment in tree-vrp.h Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Hello, looking at the history, it seems that this comment should be updated as in the following patch (the definition of struct value_range is right below and explains VR_RANGE and VR_ANTI_RANGE). I am not committing this as obvious because the text below does *not* actually describe VR_VARYING or VR_UNDEFINED, and while I know what VR_VARYING means, I am still confused by VR_UNDEFINED, so cannot write that comment myself. 2017-11-06 Marc Glisse * tree-vrp.h (enum value_range_type): Update stale comment. --- tree-vrp.h (revision 254429) +++ tree-vrp.h (working copy) @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3. #ifndef GCC_TREE_VRP_H #define GCC_TREE_VRP_H -/* Type of value ranges. See value_range_d In tree-vrp.c for a +/* Type of value ranges. See value_range below for a description of these types. */ enum value_range_type { VR_UNDEFINED, VR_RANGE, VR_ANTI_RANGE, VR_VARYING, VR_LAST };