| Message ID | Y6A9BBI4OAIb0s9a@tucnak |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [committed] testsuite: Fix up pr107397.f90 test [PR107397] | expand |
On 12/19/22 2:29 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Sat, Dec 17, 2022 at 09:12:43AM -0800, Jerry D via Gcc-patches wrote: >> The attached patch fixes a regression and is a patch from Steve. I have >> regression tested it and provided a test case. It is fairly simple and I >> will commit under the "simple" rule in a little while. >> >> Thanks Steve for Patch. Thanks Harald for helping me get back up to speed on >> the git magic. > > The pr107397.f90 test FAILs for me, one problem was that the > added diagnostics has an indefinite article before BOZ, but > the test dg-error didn't. The other problem was that on the > other dg-error there was no space between the string and closing > }, so it was completely ignored and the error was an excess > error. > > 2022-12-19 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> > > PR fortran/107397 > * gfortran.dg/pr107397.f90: Adjust expected diagnostic wording and > add space between dg-error string and closing }. === snip === Thanks Jakub.
--- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr107397.f90.jj 2022-12-19 11:09:13.793166473 +0100 +++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr107397.f90 2022-12-19 11:23:02.981322107 +0100 @@ -4,6 +4,6 @@ program p type t real :: a = 1.0 end type - type(t), parameter :: x = z'1' ! { dg-error "incompatible with BOZ" } - x%a = x%a + 2 ! { dg-error "has no IMPLICIT type"} + type(t), parameter :: x = z'1' ! { dg-error "incompatible with a BOZ" } + x%a = x%a + 2 ! { dg-error "has no IMPLICIT type" } end