diff mbox

[test] Revise gcc.dg/vect/pr57558-1.c by using int instead of long

Message ID VI1PR0802MB2176D1F885BAED8A3CA15F9FE7F40@VI1PR0802MB2176.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Bin Cheng Sept. 19, 2016, 2:54 p.m. UTC 
Hi,
Case gcc.dg/vect/pr57558-1.c uses unsigned long at the moment which can't be vectorized on Sparc64.  This patch revises it by using unsigned int.  I think it's an obvious change.
Test result checked, is it OK?

Thanks,
bin

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2016-09-15  Bin Cheng  <bin.cheng@arm.com>

	* gcc.dg/vect/pr57558-1.c: Use unsigned int instead of unsigned long.

Comments

Jeff Law Sept. 19, 2016, 4:19 p.m. UTC | #1 
On 09/19/2016 08:54 AM, Bin Cheng wrote:
> Hi,
> Case gcc.dg/vect/pr57558-1.c uses unsigned long at the moment which can't be vectorized on Sparc64.  This patch revises it by using unsigned int.  I think it's an obvious change.
> Test result checked, is it OK?
>
> Thanks,
> bin
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
> 2016-09-15  Bin Cheng  <bin.cheng@arm.com>
>
> 	* gcc.dg/vect/pr57558-1.c: Use unsigned int instead of unsigned long.
>
OK.
jeff
diff mbox

Patch

Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr57558-1.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr57558-1.c	(revision 240166)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr57558-1.c	(working copy)
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ 
 /* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-require-effective-target vect_int } */
 
-typedef unsigned long ul;
-void foo (ul* __restrict x, ul* __restrict y, ul n)
+typedef unsigned int u_int;
+void foo (u_int* __restrict x, u_int* __restrict y, u_int n)
 {
-  ul i;
+  u_int i;
   for (i=1; i<=n; i++, x++, y++)
     *x += *y;
 }