diff mbox series

testsuite: add the case to cover vectorization of A[(i+x)*stride] [PR114322]

Message ID CYYPR01MB830975D3D960F112E00AB5D5E1332@CYYPR01MB8309.prod.exchangelabs.com
State New
Headers show
Series testsuite: add the case to cover vectorization of A[(i+x)*stride] [PR114322] | expand

Commit Message

Hao Liu OS March 20, 2024, 7:55 a.m. UTC
Hi Richard,

As mentioned in the comments of PR114322 (which has been fixed by PR114151
r14-9540-ge0e9499a), this patch is to cover the case.

Bootstrapped and regression tested on aarch64-linux-gnu, OK for trunk?

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	PR tree-optimization/114322
	* gcc.dg/vect/pr114322.c: New testcase.

Comments

Richard Biener March 20, 2024, 8:21 a.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024, Hao Liu OS wrote:

> Hi Richard,
> 
> As mentioned in the comments of PR114322 (which has been fixed by PR114151
> r14-9540-ge0e9499a), this patch is to cover the case.
> 
> Bootstrapped and regression tested on aarch64-linux-gnu, OK for trunk?
> 
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> 
> 	PR tree-optimization/114322
> 	* gcc.dg/vect/pr114322.c: New testcase.
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr114322.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr114322.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..7c3a4ffe260
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr114322.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> +/* PR tree-optimization/114322 */
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +
> +int
> +foo (short *A, int x, int stride)
> +{
> +  int sum = 0;
> +
> +  if (stride > 1)
> +    {
> +      for (int i = 0; i < 1024; ++i)
> +        sum += A[(i + x) * stride];
> +    }
> +
> +  return sum;
> +}
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "LOOP VECTORIZED" "vect" { target aarch64*-*-* } } } */

I don't like the target selector very much - if you make 'A'
a 'int *', the strided access should be the important part,
vect_int should match the requirements - the strided access should
end up with VMAT_ELEMENTWISE at worst (possibly gather on aarch64?),
and VMAT_ELEMENTWISE doesn't need any alignment.

So - OK with using { target vect_int } instead.

Richard.
Hao Liu OS March 20, 2024, 9:43 a.m. UTC | #2
> So - OK with using { target vect_int } instead.

Sure, it's much better to be target independent.

Refactored and committed in r14-9569-g4c276896

Thanks,
- Hao
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr114322.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr114322.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..7c3a4ffe260
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr114322.c
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ 
+/* PR tree-optimization/114322 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+
+int
+foo (short *A, int x, int stride)
+{
+  int sum = 0;
+
+  if (stride > 1)
+    {
+      for (int i = 0; i < 1024; ++i)
+        sum += A[(i + x) * stride];
+    }
+
+  return sum;
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "LOOP VECTORIZED" "vect" { target aarch64*-*-* } } } */