Message ID | CAMe9rOraZqE8O8KBTurbkA1oVpCVRiaVhHp2gUnpT9AYDrt46Q@mail.gmail.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Dear Tobias, On 21 Mar 2015, at 14:28, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 6:19 AM, Dominique Dhumieres <dominiq@lps.ens.fr> wrote: a couple of minor nits that Dominique and I spotted while discussing this : > -@item @emph{NOTE} A simple implementation could be a simple @code{__asm__ maybe "A simple implementation could be " ... would read more smoothly? > -__volatile__ ("":::"memory)} to prevent code movements. > +@item @emph{NOTE} A simple implementation could be a simple > +@code{__asm__ __volatile__ ("":::"memory)} to prevent code movements. > @end table also: @code{__asm__ __volatile__ ("":::"memory)} <= seems to be missing a quotation mark. i.e. __asm__ __volatile__ ("" ::: "memory") I wonder if the latter was somehow confusing the newer edition of texinfo? cheers, Iain
Index: ChangeLog =================================================================== --- ChangeLog (revision 221551) +++ ChangeLog (working copy) @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +2015-03-21 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com> + + * gfortran.texi (_gfortran_caf_sync_memory): Put @{xxx} in one + line. + 2015-03-21 Tobias Burnus <burnus@net-b.de> * gfortran.texi (_gfortran_caf_sync_all, _gfortran_caf_sync_images, Index: gfortran.texi =================================================================== --- gfortran.texi (revision 221551) +++ gfortran.texi (working copy) @@ -3847,8 +3847,8 @@ @item @var{errmsg_len} @tab the buffer size of errmsg. @end multitable -@item @emph{NOTE} A simple implementation could be a simple @code{__asm__ -__volatile__ ("":::"memory)} to prevent code movements. +@item @emph{NOTE} A simple implementation could be a simple +@code{__asm__ __volatile__ ("":::"memory)} to prevent code movements. @end table