Message ID | CAKdSQZmU+dduhNtSu-iSXnuPQ=PjtJB_bDghQy9KGsqwBcOZJQ@mail.gmail.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Igor Zamyatin <izamyatin@gmail.com> wrote: > I'd like this patch (original version at the bottom) also to be > backported into 4.7. > > Is it safe to backport? Looks safe to me. OK if there are no objections from RMs in the next 24h. Thanks, Uros.
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c index 976bbb4..331e29a 100644 --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c @@ -24103,6 +24103,7 @@ ia32_multipass_dfa_lookahead (void) case PROCESSOR_CORE2_64: case PROCESSOR_COREI7_32: case PROCESSOR_COREI7_64: + case PROCESSOR_ATOM: /* Generally, we want haifa-sched:max_issue() to look ahead as far as many instructions can be executed on a cycle, i.e., issue_rate. I wonder why tuning for many CPUs does not do this. */