Message ID | CAKdSQZ=VgwgqTNSxXts7mPMUh-1C6K8yaOEqtxU5iOG4Mhr-iA@mail.gmail.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
>> Looks safe to me. >> >> OK if there are no objections from RMs in the next 24h. > > All testing passed so following will be checked in 4.7. Checked in. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2012-08/msg00815.html Thanks, K
Index: gcc/config/i386/i386.c =================================================================== --- gcc/config/i386/i386.c (revision 190833) +++ gcc/config/i386/i386.c (working copy) @@ -23842,6 +23842,7 @@ case PROCESSOR_CORE2_64: case PROCESSOR_COREI7_32: case PROCESSOR_COREI7_64: + case PROCESSOR_ATOM: /* Generally, we want haifa-sched:max_issue() to look ahead as far as many instructions can be executed on a cycle, i.e., issue_rate. I wonder why tuning for many CPUs does not do this. */