From patchwork Tue Apr 17 17:25:49 2012 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Uros Bizjak X-Patchwork-Id: 153258 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3031FB7010 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 03:26:30 +1000 (EST) Comment: DKIM? See http://www.dkim.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; x=1335288391; h=Comment: DomainKey-Signature:Received:Received:Received:Received: MIME-Version:Received:Received:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From:To: Content-Type:Mailing-List:Precedence:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender:Delivered-To; bh=/vGV+d7 g5RsSsSF3Mcxcf6PT1Sk=; b=GAoUtcqPKlK9Q0ULmEbMKEjBW6W6h7FddHTRNgN eX7ntz6RcbL7OBX+vX+NghwvOZpLo+rDxk6jCZW5EJDfkM8IfIv/FVJZNERb1AiL CE7d/J0LwnohURHDJKyqwHp+UFWSm4lMpVrTL37g5ytd34+NQCA4fztZKIoMG3qP +2y4= Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=Received:Received:X-SWARE-Spam-Status:X-Spam-Check-By:Received:Received:MIME-Version:Received:Received:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Content-Type:Mailing-List:Precedence:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender:Delivered-To; b=mvP1ZI1gspESEJH7/x+b7yJdxdShlHB34XGr6cZPOCX0Rp1iTCZKx2VI7PgtXP vPvmrL1EREkm3LNIwNf+yGjgZ0h/FIrO4pRRbBi1fK17AREzNxXsCc7NKJ/QPXiE Wx1byhSenY3RunPvCmjRPYdrMtwVeVpzU4KA3I/A3jh8Y=; Received: (qmail 31227 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2012 17:26:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 31170 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Apr 2012 17:26:23 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, KHOP_RCVD_TRUST, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE, TW_ZJ X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-yw0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-yw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.213.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:25:50 +0000 Received: by yhjj56 with SMTP id j56so3448532yhj.20 for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 10:25:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.245.23 with SMTP id s23mr4751835anh.63.1334683549615; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 10:25:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.146.124.5 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 10:25:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 19:25:49 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: [PATCH, i386]: Fix PR 53020, another victim of IOR vs OR naming difference From: Uros Bizjak To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Hello! Correct name of atomic "or" named pattern is "atomic_orM", not "atomic_iorM". Attached patch fixes this oversight. 2012-04-17 Uros Bizjak PR target/53020 * config/i386/sync.md (atomic_): Rename to atomic_. Patch was bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, will be committed to all release branches. Uros. Index: config/i386/sync.md =================================================================== --- config/i386/sync.md (revision 186539) +++ config/i386/sync.md (working copy) @@ -576,7 +576,7 @@ return "lock{%;} sub{}\t{%1, %0|%0, %1}"; }) -(define_insn "atomic_" +(define_insn "atomic_" [(set (match_operand:SWI 0 "memory_operand" "+m") (unspec_volatile:SWI [(any_logic:SWI (match_dup 0)