@@ -3824,8 +3824,8 @@ await_statement_walker (tree *stmt, int *do_subtree, void *d)
the parameter to return_value(). */
if (!maybe_await_stmt)
maybe_await_stmt = tsi_stmt_ptr (tsi_last (ret_list));
- expr = build1_loc (loc, GOTO_EXPR, void_type_node, awpts->fs_label);
- finish_expr_stmt (expr);
+ TREE_USED (awpts->fs_label) = 1;
+ add_stmt (build_stmt (loc, GOTO_EXPR, awpts->fs_label));
*stmt = pop_stmt_list (ret_list);
/* Once this is complete, we will have processed subtrees. */
*do_subtree = 0;
Hi, Minor cleanup, this is statement not an expression, we do not need to use finish_expr_stmt here. tested on x86_64, powerpc64-linux, x86_64-darwin, pushed to master as trivial/obvious, thanks Iain Signed-off-by: Iain Sandoe <iain@sandoe.co.uk> gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * coroutines.cc (await_statement_walker): Use build_stmt and add_stmt instead of build1 and finish_expr_stmt. --- gcc/cp/coroutines.cc | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --