From patchwork Thu Nov 8 12:17:28 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Aldy Hernandez X-Patchwork-Id: 994825 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=gcc.gnu.org (client-ip=209.132.180.131; helo=sourceware.org; envelope-from=gcc-patches-return-489349-incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gcc.gnu.org header.i=@gcc.gnu.org header.b="oiBkxqT4"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42rMjx3DW0z9sBN for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 23:17:41 +1100 (AEDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender:to :from:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=WIVNpFl0AjOZtj7havTtKZbvATtnFp03ENjwSRg+MAaY4h/8Xc 25gjmgawwQp0XGMybE+xNYGbsQqzT74+uLRqFid/BanPVWgXuu5mo+LiH965DEFW yzdy3ZCP2lRN5FSqmUoTgGsO67ts3oyd7rKjEkUxlTQLqrIxTfeVqohM4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender:to :from:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:content-type; s= default; bh=juSzA3mS6GcuFoB3bXGxnUcxoUs=; b=oiBkxqT4GzQdsi7tXDPl pBR8Czbw5NCz2aC+jczYdxxDk+6KJX5OFR+Lr+ownt2FNrp5faEfWwMA82PwFrzr FW8yekmIiHd/fV2b/84HL1NPSHJBfkqzqvIamtUjR7VXARom+qs7yMS2CTp8ePLX 0a81qp1c/kPFydTTFGL/6fc= Received: (qmail 44275 invoked by alias); 8 Nov 2018 12:17:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 44265 invoked by uid 89); 8 Nov 2018 12:17:34 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-26.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, GIT_PATCH_0, GIT_PATCH_1, GIT_PATCH_2, GIT_PATCH_3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=one's, Hx-languages-length:935 X-HELO: mail-wr1-f47.google.com Received: from mail-wr1-f47.google.com (HELO mail-wr1-f47.google.com) (209.85.221.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Nov 2018 12:17:32 +0000 Received: by mail-wr1-f47.google.com with SMTP id j26-v6so21044698wre.1 for ; Thu, 08 Nov 2018 04:17:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from abulafia.quesejoda.com (128.red-88-6-116.staticip.rima-tde.net. [88.6.116.128]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c14-v6sm4883618wmh.44.2018.11.08.04.17.29 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 08 Nov 2018 04:17:29 -0800 (PST) To: gcc-patches , Andrew MacLeod From: Aldy Hernandez Subject: record_ranges_from_incoming_edge: use value_range API for creating new range Message-ID: <79800e67-85d6-be61-b105-65e945361bf9@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 07:17:28 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-IsSubscribed: yes This one's rather obvious and does not depend on any get_range_info API change. OK for trunk? * gimple-ssa-evrp-analyze.c (evrp_range_analyzer::record_ranges_from_incoming_edge): Use value_range API instead of piecing together ranges. diff --git a/gcc/gimple-ssa-evrp-analyze.c b/gcc/gimple-ssa-evrp-analyze.c index 3e5287b1b0b..ec39895cceb 100644 --- a/gcc/gimple-ssa-evrp-analyze.c +++ b/gcc/gimple-ssa-evrp-analyze.c @@ -207,7 +207,8 @@ evrp_range_analyzer::record_ranges_from_incoming_edge (basic_block bb) getting first [64, +INF] and then ~[0, 0] from conditions like (s & 0x3cc0) == 0). */ value_range *old_vr = get_value_range (vrs[i].first); - value_range tem (old_vr->kind (), old_vr->min (), old_vr->max ()); + value_range tem = *old_vr; + tem.equiv_clear (); tem.intersect (vrs[i].second); if (tem.ignore_equivs_equal_p (*old_vr)) continue;