From patchwork Wed Mar 29 21:27:28 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Bill Schmidt X-Patchwork-Id: 744972 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3vtgpV3w0Sz9s0g for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 08:27:45 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gcc.gnu.org header.i=@gcc.gnu.org header.b="pJyAIyO9"; dkim-atps=neutral DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender:to:cc :from:subject:date:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; q=dns; s=default; b=JU+8Q gXbhRcSyViEug27yCaey5XnOTcuEROKHmZgBZ5EAA9LPN1OxEqOl3VANqkmRZcXu kGM/6zh5t0fIepoF/mT4nTzcUMol7LQUaQsMK8cRgRNYIi4D8MzyC+oaMhXkGcSa 5IqTaoQwZAwRBcC7pG19pGPV33dCXJJeyb7uts= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender:to:cc :from:subject:date:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; s=default; bh=zaYi+wj5D/S k2Z/hQRGbcHvGJeI=; b=pJyAIyO9DqdAX/3qC+EeuX2KEoDft5AiU8WJ8ZqNH+7 hBRp6A39UHamgHJu7944AAJhLuH3iljgXUpVuevWNFwSxLWutwrdiQTX/WCdMO0/ 6RXS78pxdq7EzIsCZ2UySnqLj9QRvg69D+QQHYqjb0v5QygvQMuQHAJOLwEfaO68 = Received: (qmail 27527 invoked by alias); 29 Mar 2017 21:27:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27518 invoked by uid 89); 29 Mar 2017 21:27:34 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-8.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, GIT_PATCH_2, GIT_PATCH_3, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, URI_WP_HACKED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=pdf, PDF, wpcontent, wp-content X-HELO: mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (HELO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com) (148.163.158.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 21:27:33 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.20/8.16.0.20) with SMTP id v2TLJ7xu075624 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 17:27:33 -0400 Received: from e11.ny.us.ibm.com (e11.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.201]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 29gcna77r6-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 17:27:32 -0400 Received: from localhost by e11.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 17:27:32 -0400 Received: from b01cxnp23034.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.29) by e11.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.198) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 17:27:29 -0400 Received: from b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.111]) by b01cxnp23034.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id v2TLRTup46071962; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 21:27:29 GMT Received: from b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89D19AC040; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 17:27:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from bigmac.rchland.ibm.com (unknown [9.10.86.201]) by b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6249BAC046; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 17:27:19 -0400 (EDT) To: GCC Patches Cc: Segher Boessenkool From: Bill Schmidt Subject: [PATCH, rs6000] Document location of ELF V2 ABI specification Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 16:27:28 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 17032921-2213-0000-0000-0000017872F3 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00006873; HX=3.00000240; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000206; SDB=6.00840486; UDB=6.00413681; IPR=6.00618480; BA=6.00005248; NDR=6.00000001; ZLA=6.00000005; ZF=6.00000009; ZB=6.00000000; ZP=6.00000000; ZH=6.00000000; ZU=6.00000002; MB=3.00014856; XFM=3.00000013; UTC=2017-03-29 21:27:31 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 17032921-2214-0000-0000-0000551237CC Message-Id: <77c9a580-4ce4-5b21-7916-076696f5199a@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-03-29_15:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1702020001 definitions=main-1703290179 X-IsSubscribed: yes Hi, There is finally a permanent link to the OpenPOWER ELF V2 ABI Specification document. This patch adds a paragraph to the PowerPC Built-Ins section of the GCC documentation to describe its value and provide a link to it. I've generated and verified the PDF, and it looks ok. I am very open to changes in wording. Is this ok for trunk? Thanks, Bill 2017-03-29 Bill Schmidt * doc/extend.texi (6.60.22 PowerPC AltiVec Built-in Functions): Add reference to the OpenPOWER 64-Bit ELF V2 ABI Specification. Index: gcc/doc/extend.texi =================================================================== --- gcc/doc/extend.texi (revision 246566) +++ gcc/doc/extend.texi (working copy) @@ -15539,6 +15539,15 @@ Internally, GCC uses built-in functions to achieve the aforementioned header file, but they are not supported and are subject to change without notice. +GCC complies with the OpenPOWER 64-Bit ELF V2 ABI Specification, +which may be found at +@uref{http://openpowerfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/resources/leabi-prd/content/index.html}. +Appendix A of this document lists the vector API interfaces that must be +provided by compliant compilers. Programmers should preferentially use +the interfaces described therein. However, historically GCC has provided +additional interfaces for access to vector instructions. These are +described briefly below. + The following interfaces are supported for the generic and specific AltiVec operations and the AltiVec predicates. In cases where there is a direct mapping between generic and specific operations, only the