diff mbox

[C++] PR 23608

Message ID 519A1C9A.7040408@oracle.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Paolo Carlini May 20, 2013, 12:52 p.m. UTC
Hi,

this issue was primarily about a bogus warning for line 9 of the 
original testcase (the line 'ic < 5u;') which it's already fixed in 4.8.

While reassessing it, I noticed that the location for the genuine 
warning, which should point to the '<' operator, is off two chars to the 
right: that can be easily fixed by propagating loc from build_new_op_1 
to cp_build_binary_op.  Note, I have to adjust an existing testcase: I 
think it was incorrect to refer to the macro for the -Wdouble-promotion 
warning about the implicit conversion in the binary expression: the 
issue doesn't happen when the macro is expanded, but later for the '+' 
in 'cf + 1.0 * ID'.

Tested x86_64-linux.

Thanks!
Paolo.

//////////////////////////
/cp
2013-05-20  Paolo Carlini  <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>

	PR c++/23608
	* call.c (build_new_op_1): Propagate loc to cp_build_binary_op.

/testsuite
2013-05-20  Paolo Carlini  <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>

	PR c++/23608
	* g++.dg/warn/Wsign-compare-6.C: New.
	* g++.dg/warn/Wdouble-promotion.C: Adjust.

Comments

Jason Merrill May 20, 2013, 12:54 p.m. UTC | #1
OK.

Jason
diff mbox

Patch

Index: cp/call.c
===================================================================
--- cp/call.c	(revision 199093)
+++ cp/call.c	(working copy)
@@ -5418,7 +5418,7 @@  build_new_op_1 (location_t loc, enum tree_code cod
     case BIT_AND_EXPR:
     case BIT_IOR_EXPR:
     case BIT_XOR_EXPR:
-      return cp_build_binary_op (input_location, code, arg1, arg2, complain);
+      return cp_build_binary_op (loc, code, arg1, arg2, complain);
 
     case UNARY_PLUS_EXPR:
     case NEGATE_EXPR:
Index: testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wdouble-promotion.C
===================================================================
--- testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wdouble-promotion.C	(revision 199093)
+++ testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wdouble-promotion.C	(working copy)
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ 
 
 /* Some targets do not provide <complex.h> so we define I ourselves.  */
 #define I 1.0iF
-#define ID ((_Complex double)I) // { dg-warning "implicit" }
+#define ID ((_Complex double)I)
 
 float f;
 double d;
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@  usual_arithmetic_conversions(void)
 
   local_cf = cf + 1.0;       /* { dg-warning "implicit" } */
   local_cf = cf - d;         /* { dg-warning "implicit" } */
-  local_cf = cf + 1.0 * ID;  /* { dg-message "in expansion of macro 'ID'" } */
+  local_cf = cf + 1.0 * ID;  /* { dg-warning "implicit" } */
   local_cf = cf - cd;        /* { dg-warning "implicit" } */
   
   local_f = i ? f : d;       /* { dg-warning "implicit" } */
Index: testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wsign-compare-6.C
===================================================================
--- testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wsign-compare-6.C	(revision 0)
+++ testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wsign-compare-6.C	(working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ 
+// PR c++/23608
+// { dg-options "-Wsign-compare" }
+
+#define FIVE 5
+
+int main()
+{
+  int i = 5;
+  int const ic = 5;
+
+  i < 5u;  // { dg-warning "5:comparison between signed and unsigned" }
+  ic < 5u;     
+  FIVE < 5u;
+}