Message ID | 4bfd8047-67af-e1ed-e0bd-8f6a8c486bbe@suse.cz |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | Fix ICE in tree-switch-conversion. | expand |
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 12:53 PM Martin Liška <mliska@suse.cz> wrote: > > With SVE we can end up with: > switch (POLY_INT_CST [2, 2]) <default: <L2> [INV], case 2: <L3> [INV], case 4: <L3> [INV]> > which is fine to expand and we can remove the assert. > > Ready to be installed? OK. Richard. > Thanks, > Martin > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > PR tree-optimization/96915 > * tree-switch-conversion.c (switch_conversion::expand): Accept > also integer constants. > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > PR tree-optimization/96915 > * gcc.target/aarch64/sve/pr96915.c: New test. > --- > gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/pr96915.c | 11 +++++++++++ > gcc/tree-switch-conversion.c | 3 --- > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/pr96915.c > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/pr96915.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/pr96915.c > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000000..fae4cd42117 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/pr96915.c > @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ > +/* PR tree-optimization/96915 */ > +/* { dg-do compile } */ > +/* { dg-options "-O3 -march=armv8.2-a+sve" } */ > + > +#pragma GCC aarch64 "arm_sve.h" > +void b() { > + switch (svcntd()) > + case 2: > + case 4: > + b(); > +} > diff --git a/gcc/tree-switch-conversion.c b/gcc/tree-switch-conversion.c > index 4b435941d12..186411ff3c4 100644 > --- a/gcc/tree-switch-conversion.c > +++ b/gcc/tree-switch-conversion.c > @@ -984,9 +984,6 @@ switch_conversion::expand (gswitch *swtch) > during gimplification). */ > gcc_checking_assert (TREE_TYPE (m_index_expr) != error_mark_node); > > - /* A switch on a constant should have been optimized in tree-cfg-cleanup. */ > - gcc_checking_assert (!TREE_CONSTANT (m_index_expr)); > - > /* Prefer bit test if possible. */ > if (tree_fits_uhwi_p (m_range_size) > && bit_test_cluster::can_be_handled (tree_to_uhwi (m_range_size), m_uniq) > -- > 2.28.0 >
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/pr96915.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/pr96915.c new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fae4cd42117 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/pr96915.c @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +/* PR tree-optimization/96915 */ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options "-O3 -march=armv8.2-a+sve" } */ + +#pragma GCC aarch64 "arm_sve.h" +void b() { + switch (svcntd()) + case 2: + case 4: + b(); +} diff --git a/gcc/tree-switch-conversion.c b/gcc/tree-switch-conversion.c index 4b435941d12..186411ff3c4 100644 --- a/gcc/tree-switch-conversion.c +++ b/gcc/tree-switch-conversion.c @@ -984,9 +984,6 @@ switch_conversion::expand (gswitch *swtch) during gimplification). */ gcc_checking_assert (TREE_TYPE (m_index_expr) != error_mark_node); - /* A switch on a constant should have been optimized in tree-cfg-cleanup. */ - gcc_checking_assert (!TREE_CONSTANT (m_index_expr)); - /* Prefer bit test if possible. */ if (tree_fits_uhwi_p (m_range_size) && bit_test_cluster::can_be_handled (tree_to_uhwi (m_range_size), m_uniq)