diff mbox

[testsuite] PR 52229, testsuite failure

Message ID 4F3974F6.1080907@netcologne.de
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Thomas Koenig Feb. 13, 2012, 8:39 p.m. UTC
Hello world,

the attached patch xfails the offencing test case on architectures
which do not allow unaligned access for vecorization.  OK for trunk?
Any other architectures which should be XFAILed?

Regression-tested on powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu.  OK for trunk?

	Thomas

2012-02-13  Thomas Koenig  <tkoenig@gcc.gnu.org>

         PR testsuite/52229
         PR fortran/32380
         * gfortran.dg/vect/pr32380.f:  XFAIL on PowerPC and ia-64.

Comments

Thomas Koenig Feb. 17, 2012, 8:57 p.m. UTC | #1
Am 13.02.2012 21:39, schrieb Thomas Koenig:

Ping?

> Hello world,
>
> the attached patch xfails the offencing test case on architectures
> which do not allow unaligned access for vecorization. OK for trunk?
> Any other architectures which should be XFAILed?
>
> Regression-tested on powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK for trunk?
>
> Thomas
>
> 2012-02-13 Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@gcc.gnu.org>
>
> PR testsuite/52229
> PR fortran/32380
> * gfortran.dg/vect/pr32380.f: XFAIL on PowerPC and ia-64.
diff mbox

Patch

Index: pr32380.f
===================================================================
--- pr32380.f	(Revision 184166)
+++ pr32380.f	(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -259,5 +259,5 @@ 
       return
       end
 
-! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 7 loops" 1 "vect" } }
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 7 loops" 1 "vect" { xfail powerpc*-*-* ia64-*-*-* } } }
 ! { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "vect" } }