From patchwork Sun Jan 8 13:20:50 2012 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Chung-Lin Tang X-Patchwork-Id: 134909 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 07C68B6F6F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 00:21:51 +1100 (EST) Comment: DKIM? See http://www.dkim.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; x=1326633712; h=Comment: DomainKey-Signature:Received:Received:Received:Received:Received: Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject: Content-Type:Mailing-List:Precedence:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender:Delivered-To; bh=F3y0cx0 csHy5/D9TwCy3XqyZr6o=; b=bhzM5KOu5i7wKC5ZS7NGmgtQsWhkWSelutIVeQ2 U7iIXh/8B3D5Kq5z/2pFfWsk5psp/1it2DugxzZUgF6JSgIM8ZAfyp/F/4u8hY6I Zv/2Sq62b0kV12qMLA7u5X0deWWJ5AsrR0pwSS5HEd91iNwCINpg9jsD4kPKIz+u khQg= Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=Received:Received:X-SWARE-Spam-Status:X-Spam-Check-By:Received:Received:Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type:X-IsSubscribed:Mailing-List:Precedence:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender:Delivered-To; b=FgHUrOnbjiIdLmVkRa8HLRZHwT5FpXbDPw8wibfEaAtDNvukDj0mMnUsl1OBrk XquVZt5tEVpVOq1Qm9/MdRWbtgKFjauV1rq3bnYSC3uwBbKDNYoOc2AN+jUxB7N2 ZcylKbHldXE05lgoWJV3mSs+sfscB/HtVaOMx+6Fxdhhk=; Received: (qmail 5366 invoked by alias); 8 Jan 2012 13:21:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 5357 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Jan 2012 13:21:46 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, FROM_12LTRDOM X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 13:21:34 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-exc-10.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.58]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1Rjsgn-0001iY-Ik from ChungLin_Tang@mentor.com for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 05:21:33 -0800 Received: from SVR-ORW-FEM-04.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.97.41]) by SVR-ORW-EXC-10.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 8 Jan 2012 05:21:24 -0800 Received: from [0.0.0.0] (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-fem-04.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.97.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.289.1; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 05:21:14 -0800 Message-ID: <4F099832.2080506@codesourcery.com> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 21:20:50 +0800 From: Chung-Lin Tang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gcc-patches Subject: [PATCH] [committed obvious] Fix small leak in cfgloop.c X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Hi, I noticed that cfgloop.c:cancel_loop() is missing a free of the bbs array obtained from get_loop_body(). Committed attached patch as obvious. Thanks, Chung-Lin 2012-01-08 Chung-Lin Tang * cfgloop.c (cancel_loop): Add free() of bbs array. Index: cfgloop.c =================================================================== --- cfgloop.c (revision 182989) +++ cfgloop.c (revision 182990) @@ -1285,6 +1285,7 @@ for (i = 0; i < loop->num_nodes; i++) bbs[i]->loop_father = outer; + free (bbs); delete_loop (loop); }