From patchwork Wed Jul 28 18:14:04 2010
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Patchwork-Submitter: Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>
X-Patchwork-Id: 60167
Return-Path: 
 <gcc-patches-return-269214-incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org>
X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org
Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org
Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131])
	by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 26F90B6F0E
	for <incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org>;
	Thu, 29 Jul 2010 04:14:12 +1000 (EST)
Received: (qmail 21125 invoked by alias); 28 Jul 2010 18:14:09 -0000
Received: (qmail 21108 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Jul 2010 18:14:08 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL, BAYES_00,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from vsmtp4.tin.it (HELO vsmtp4.tin.it) (212.216.176.224) by
	sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP;
	Wed, 28 Jul 2010 18:14:03 +0000
Received: from [192.168.0.4] (79.47.194.87) by vsmtp4.tin.it (8.5.113) id
	4BCE3CBE087A442B; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:14:00 +0200
Message-ID: <4C50736C.5070108@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:14:04 +0200
From: Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
	rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100520 SUSE/3.0.5 Thunderbird/3.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
CC: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Subject: [C++ Patch] PR 45096
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: 
 <mailto:gcc-patches-unsubscribe-incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org

Hi,

adding the begin and end overloads for initializer_list very slightly
changed the behavior of the C++ front-end on this testcase and now the
error at line 13 mentions initializer_list<_Tp>, instead of the previous
initializer_list<auto>. That change seems benign to me and I'm proposing
to just tweak a bit the testcase. Patch tested x86_64-linux. Is it ok?

Thanks,
Paolo.

/////////////////
2010-07-28  Paolo Carlini  <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>

	PR c++/45096
	* g++.dg/cpp0x/auto3.C: Tweak dg-error string.

Index: g++.dg/cpp0x/auto3.C
===================================================================
--- g++.dg/cpp0x/auto3.C	(revision 162649)
+++ g++.dg/cpp0x/auto3.C	(working copy)
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ auto x;				// { dg-error "auto" }
 auto i = 42, j = 42.0;		// { dg-error "auto" }
 
 // New CWG issue
-auto a[2] = { 1, 2 };		// { dg-error "auto" }
+auto a[2] = { 1, 2 };		// { dg-error "initializer_list" }
 
 template<class T>
 struct A { };