From patchwork Mon Mar 11 10:23:00 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Torbjorn SVENSSON X-Patchwork-Id: 1910376 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=foss.st.com header.i=@foss.st.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=selector1 header.b=id1ziIqA; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gcc.gnu.org (client-ip=8.43.85.97; helo=server2.sourceware.org; envelope-from=gcc-patches-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TtY4C6xhMz1yWm for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 21:32:11 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E914F3858C62 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 10:32:09 +0000 (GMT) X-Original-To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Received: from mx07-00178001.pphosted.com (mx07-00178001.pphosted.com [185.132.182.106]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E5083858C98 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 10:31:43 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 6E5083858C98 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=foss.st.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=foss.st.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 6E5083858C98 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=185.132.182.106 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1710153105; cv=none; b=OX1Moq+vXD3EoqxHdrPb43kJiU+pBqIcFcR3N5Eii5FfHUYrFdVMIG4Apu1FPjs3yx6YJQGsF3bedAGilSAHQZSJNYXD4C2Pzm55EwIqpf6gRiG9OZkVLesGz3U08mmLkznCEudfd6PRyTdbDYOGnSZm3pn4gutrTRKTsLSXRgI= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1710153105; c=relaxed/simple; bh=lp3I0LvJhlwLFCda4GxcluRmoAZ93rI+jfnInZqSH0g=; h=DKIM-Signature:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=N5k8wvefXw3Zs3oqafuzJ8A9A72bxrJB3uK/T5HX5mKEMAb22VpFPplTBbLcY+rkItRMsrumiBxNGnRTlTOiBfaJgLOf2XQ2pbCUnW6ZA1GpgR4eGs7UQawXBNVH1LsNB8CuVUH0La//AQ3Y9ruf6KsTQarGiB+SjdKSgIEgRLI= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from pps.filterd (m0288072.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx07-00178001.pphosted.com (8.17.1.24/8.17.1.24) with ESMTP id 42B7LEhO029943; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 11:31:41 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=foss.st.com; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= selector1; bh=KHHqKA9BgpGBH5vIwqpasn8jl7zVtDBacBaHoF7YLgU=; b=id 1ziIqAYwJoNRzc1OVwmvDQaLx844GqteQ23hmtjbUvHpfGwDOy67jKY1yas9PdrP lb8NzbkP5TXAqZfR/goKavSzhfGVxnG8UQhVF5MUFLUgFXyGaTuvZgFRL4ZRlFH1 +yZm0LE/XaoTGfMm8jZ3GGr2LO+9s4uhmcSuiMmwqH6V2ZJOEGbUhJUZeBhkoc56 yvI35gPvQ71UJOlEuOOa48pOPLBE7iAT2L0emMOcO8rvYD37j8km3cD/g5ks6eB7 NetH/KdRk6iqmuliWcVw4OtmOucLwcpZr2cfuCS96RoIOdvWQE+XaNlTCgyasYvP WN2FYF7VljmBZQNV//iw== Received: from beta.dmz-ap.st.com (beta.dmz-ap.st.com [138.198.100.35]) by mx07-00178001.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3wre2kqvu4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 11 Mar 2024 11:31:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from euls16034.sgp.st.com (euls16034.sgp.st.com [10.75.44.20]) by beta.dmz-ap.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 5D0C840047; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 11:31:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from Webmail-eu.st.com (shfdag1node3.st.com [10.75.129.71]) by euls16034.sgp.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 01B25215157; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 11:31:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from jkgcxl0004.jkg.st.com (10.74.22.255) by SHFDAG1NODE3.st.com (10.75.129.71) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.27; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 11:31:06 +0100 From: =?utf-8?q?Torbj=C3=B6rn_SVENSSON?= To: , CC: , , , , , , =?utf-8?q?Torbj=C3=B6rn_SVENSSON?= Subject: [PATCH v2] testsuite: xfail test for short_enums Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 11:23:00 +0100 Message-ID: <20240311102259.3091375-1-torbjorn.svensson@foss.st.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.74.22.255] X-ClientProxiedBy: SHFCAS1NODE1.st.com (10.75.129.72) To SHFDAG1NODE3.st.com (10.75.129.71) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.272,Aquarius:18.0.1011,Hydra:6.0.619,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2024-03-11_07,2024-03-06_01,2023-05-22_02 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, GIT_PATCH_0, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gcc-patches-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org Changes compared to v1: - Added reference to r14-6517-gb7e4a4c626e in dg-bogus comment - Changed arm-*-* to short_enums in target selector - Updated commit message to align with above changes As the entire block generating the warning was removed in r14-6517-gb7e4a4c626e, does it still make sense to add something to trunk for the same line? Do you want me to add the dg-bogus, but change "xfail" to "target" for trunk? Is this patch ok for releases/gcc-13? --- On arm-none-eabi, the test case fails with .../null-deref-pr108251-smp_fetch_ssl_fc_has_early-O2.c:63:65: warning: converting a packed 'enum obj_type' pointer (alignment 1) to a 'struct connection' pointer (alignment 4) may result in an unaligned pointer value [-Waddress-of-packed-member] The error was fixed in basepoints/gcc-14-6517-gb7e4a4c626e, but it was considered to be a too big change to be backported and thus, the failing test is marked xfail in GCC13. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.dg/analyzer/null-deref-pr108251-smp_fetch_ssl_fc_has_early-O2.c: Added dg-bogus with xfail on offending line for short_enums. Signed-off-by: Torbjörn SVENSSON --- .../null-deref-pr108251-smp_fetch_ssl_fc_has_early-O2.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/null-deref-pr108251-smp_fetch_ssl_fc_has_early-O2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/null-deref-pr108251-smp_fetch_ssl_fc_has_early-O2.c index 2a9c715c32c..e8cde7338a0 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/null-deref-pr108251-smp_fetch_ssl_fc_has_early-O2.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/null-deref-pr108251-smp_fetch_ssl_fc_has_early-O2.c @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ static inline enum obj_type obj_type(const enum obj_type *t) } static inline struct connection *__objt_conn(enum obj_type *t) { - return ((struct connection *)(((void *)(t)) - ((long)&((struct connection *)0)->obj_type))); + return ((struct connection *)(((void *)(t)) - ((long)&((struct connection *)0)->obj_type))); /* { dg-bogus "may result in an unaligned pointer value" "Fixed in r14-6517-gb7e4a4c626e" { xfail short_enums } */ } static inline struct connection *objt_conn(enum obj_type *t) {