| Message ID | 20221107094645.3718427-1-jcmvbkbc@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [RFA] gcc: fix PR rtl-optimization/107482 | expand |
On 2022-11-07 04:46, Max Filippov wrote: > gcc/ > * ira-color.cc (update_costs_from_allocno): Check that allocno > is in the consideration_allocno_bitmap before dereferencing > ALLOCNO_COLOR_DATA (allocno). > --- > This fixes the invalid memory access, but I'm not sure if that's > sufficient and there's no remaining higher level logical issue. Thank you for reporting and working on this issue. I believe your approach is sufficient. Although the patch could be improved by three ways: The simplest one is to move consideration allocno check out of loop by using the following patch diff --git a/gcc/ira-color.cc b/gcc/ira-color.cc index 4a1a325e8e3..a8e52b6b265 100644 --- a/gcc/ira-color.cc +++ b/gcc/ira-color.cc @@ -1413,7 +1413,9 @@ update_costs_from_allocno (ira_allocno_t allocno, int hard_regno, ira_copy_t cp, next_cp; rclass = REGNO_REG_CLASS (hard_regno); - do + if (!bitmap_bit_p (consideration_allocno_bitmap, ALLOCNO_NUM (allocno))) + return; + do { mode = ALLOCNO_MODE (allocno); ira_init_register_move_cost_if_necessary (mode); or by even better patch: diff --git a/gcc/ira-color.cc b/gcc/ira-color.cc index 4a1a325e8e3..ffe73b61c45 100644 --- a/gcc/ira-color.cc +++ b/gcc/ira-color.cc @@ -2209,8 +2209,8 @@ assign_hard_reg (ira_allocno_t a, bool retry_p) restore_costs_from_copies (a); ALLOCNO_HARD_REGNO (a) = best_hard_regno; ALLOCNO_ASSIGNED_P (a) = true; - if (best_hard_regno >= 0) - update_costs_from_copies (a, true, ! retry_p); + if (best_hard_regno >= 0 && !retry_p) + update_costs_from_copies (a, true, true); ira_assert (ALLOCNO_CLASS (a) == aclass); /* We don't need updated costs anymore. */ ira_free_allocno_updated_costs (a); Probably the best way would be to allocate and set up data for new allocnos of pseudos created on the borders of the allocation regions. But it is too complicated and I am not sure it will give some visible performance improvement. So I'd prefer the second patch with change in assign_hard_reg. Please, check that my proposed patch works and commit it in the case of success. Thank you. > Regtested for target=xtensa-linux-uclibc, no new regressions. > > gcc/ira-color.cc | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/gcc/ira-color.cc b/gcc/ira-color.cc > index 4a1a325e8e31..4527eab39bb7 100644 > --- a/gcc/ira-color.cc > +++ b/gcc/ira-color.cc > @@ -1434,6 +1434,8 @@ update_costs_from_allocno (ira_allocno_t allocno, int hard_regno, > > if (another_allocno == from > || (ALLOCNO_COLOR_DATA (another_allocno) != NULL > + && bitmap_bit_p (consideration_allocno_bitmap, > + ALLOCNO_NUM (allocno)) > && (ALLOCNO_COLOR_DATA (allocno)->first_thread_allocno > != ALLOCNO_COLOR_DATA (another_allocno)->first_thread_allocno))) > continue;
On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 12:52 PM Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com> wrote: > even better patch: > > diff --git a/gcc/ira-color.cc b/gcc/ira-color.cc > index 4a1a325e8e3..ffe73b61c45 100644 > --- a/gcc/ira-color.cc > +++ b/gcc/ira-color.cc > @@ -2209,8 +2209,8 @@ assign_hard_reg (ira_allocno_t a, bool retry_p) > restore_costs_from_copies (a); > ALLOCNO_HARD_REGNO (a) = best_hard_regno; > ALLOCNO_ASSIGNED_P (a) = true; > - if (best_hard_regno >= 0) > - update_costs_from_copies (a, true, ! retry_p); > + if (best_hard_regno >= 0 && !retry_p) > + update_costs_from_copies (a, true, true); > ira_assert (ALLOCNO_CLASS (a) == aclass); > /* We don't need updated costs anymore. */ > ira_free_allocno_updated_costs (a); > ... > Please, check that my proposed patch works and commit it in the case of > success. Thank you for taking a look and suggesting a better fix. I've tested your version for target=xtensa-linux-uclibc, it fixes the issue without new regressions. I've committed the fix to the master branch and will backport it to gcc-10, -11 and -12 in a few days.
diff --git a/gcc/ira-color.cc b/gcc/ira-color.cc index 4a1a325e8e31..4527eab39bb7 100644 --- a/gcc/ira-color.cc +++ b/gcc/ira-color.cc @@ -1434,6 +1434,8 @@ update_costs_from_allocno (ira_allocno_t allocno, int hard_regno, if (another_allocno == from || (ALLOCNO_COLOR_DATA (another_allocno) != NULL + && bitmap_bit_p (consideration_allocno_bitmap, + ALLOCNO_NUM (allocno)) && (ALLOCNO_COLOR_DATA (allocno)->first_thread_allocno != ALLOCNO_COLOR_DATA (another_allocno)->first_thread_allocno))) continue;