| Message ID | 20220414102911.681186-1-jwakely@redhat.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | libstdc++: Update incorrect statement about mainline in docs | expand |
On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > This fixes some misleading text in the libstdc++ manual that says the > docs for the gcc-11 branch refer to mainline. > > Richi, is this OK for the gcc-11 branch now? It's been wrong for 11.1 > and 11.2, but it would still be nice to fix. Yes, it's OK. I notice the same problem exists on the GCC 10 branch but GCC 9 at least mentions GCC 9 once ;) Richard. > -- >8 -- > > libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: > > * doc/xml/manual/status_cxx1998.xml: Refer to GCC 11 not > mainline. > * doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2011.xml: Likewise. > * doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2014.xml: Likewise. > * doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2017.xml: Likewise. > * doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2020.xml: Likewise. > * doc/xml/manual/status_cxxtr1.xml: Likewise. > * doc/xml/manual/status_cxxtr24733.xml: Likewise. > * doc/html/manual/status.html: Regenerate. > --- > libstdc++-v3/doc/html/manual/status.html | 24 ++++++++----------- > .../doc/xml/manual/status_cxx1998.xml | 3 +-- > .../doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2011.xml | 3 +-- > .../doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2014.xml | 4 ++-- > .../doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2017.xml | 4 ++-- > .../doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2020.xml | 4 ++-- > libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxxtr1.xml | 3 +-- > .../doc/xml/manual/status_cxxtr24733.xml | 3 +-- > 8 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx1998.xml b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx1998.xml > index 792272bcf26..f1be6667cd7 100644 > --- a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx1998.xml > +++ b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx1998.xml > @@ -18,8 +18,7 @@ This status table is based on the table of contents of ISO/IEC 14882:2003. > </para> > > <para> > -This section describes the C++ support in mainline GCC, not in any > -particular release. > +This section describes the C++ support in the GCC 11 release series. > </para> > > <!-- Status is Yes or No, Broken/Partial--> > diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2011.xml b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2011.xml > index 88844f8f0cc..e06f2479763 100644 > --- a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2011.xml > +++ b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2011.xml > @@ -34,8 +34,7 @@ This status table is based on the table of contents of ISO/IEC 14882:2011. > </para> > > <para> > -This section describes the C++11 support in mainline GCC, not in any > -particular release. > +This section describes the C++11 support in the GCC 11 release series. > </para> > > <!-- Status is Yes or No, Broken/Partial--> > diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2014.xml b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2014.xml > index 5dc287707d8..deb15c7f0d5 100644 > --- a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2014.xml > +++ b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2014.xml > @@ -29,8 +29,8 @@ since C++11 and the implementation is complete. > </para> > > <para> > -This section describes the C++14 and library TS support in mainline GCC, > -not in any particular release. > +This section describes the C++14 and library TS support in the GCC 11 > +release series. > </para> > > <!-- Status is Yes or No, Broken/Partial--> > diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2017.xml b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2017.xml > index 11372bb28b3..52bbce0a2be 100644 > --- a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2017.xml > +++ b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2017.xml > @@ -23,8 +23,8 @@ since that release. > </para> > > <para> > -This section describes the C++17 and library TS support in mainline GCC, > -not in any particular release. > +This section describes the C++17 and library TS support in the GCC 11 > +release series. > </para> > > <para> > diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2020.xml b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2020.xml > index 9e9777ea85f..411a337c534 100644 > --- a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2020.xml > +++ b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2020.xml > @@ -20,8 +20,8 @@ presence of the required flag. > </para> > > <para> > -This section describes the C++20 and library TS support in mainline GCC, > -not in any particular release. > +This section describes the C++20 and library TS support in the GCC 11 > +release series. > </para> > > <para> > diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxxtr1.xml b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxxtr1.xml > index 021cb6394a7..6533857ba12 100644 > --- a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxxtr1.xml > +++ b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxxtr1.xml > @@ -22,8 +22,7 @@ In this implementation the header names are prefixed by > </para> > > <para> > -This page describes the TR1 support in mainline GCC, not in any particular > -release. > +This page describes the TR1 support in the GCC 11 release series. > </para> > > <!-- Status is Yes or No, Broken/Partial--> > diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxxtr24733.xml b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxxtr24733.xml > index 139b94442e8..4b6d64c7c6a 100644 > --- a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxxtr24733.xml > +++ b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxxtr24733.xml > @@ -16,8 +16,7 @@ decimal floating-point arithmetic > </para> > > <para> > -This page describes the TR 24733 support in mainline GCC, not in any > -particular release. > +This page describes the TR 24733 support in the GCC 11 release series. > </para> > > <!-- Status is Yes or No, Broken/Partial--> >
On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 at 11:36, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > This fixes some misleading text in the libstdc++ manual that says the > > docs for the gcc-11 branch refer to mainline. > > > > Richi, is this OK for the gcc-11 branch now? It's been wrong for 11.1 > > and 11.2, but it would still be nice to fix. > > Yes, it's OK. I notice the same problem exists on the GCC 10 branch > but GCC 9 at least mentions GCC 9 once ;) Yes, I fixed it for gcc-9.3.0, but forgot to do it for gcc-10 and gcc-11. I pushed r10-10534 to fix gcc-10 (since that's open for doc changes) and have now pushed r11-9881 as well. Maybe this year I'll remember to do it for gcc-12 after we branch from trunk!
On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 at 11:36, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > > > This fixes some misleading text in the libstdc++ manual that says the > > > docs for the gcc-11 branch refer to mainline. > > > > > > Richi, is this OK for the gcc-11 branch now? It's been wrong for 11.1 > > > and 11.2, but it would still be nice to fix. > > > > Yes, it's OK. I notice the same problem exists on the GCC 10 branch > > but GCC 9 at least mentions GCC 9 once ;) > > Yes, I fixed it for gcc-9.3.0, but forgot to do it for gcc-10 and gcc-11. > > I pushed r10-10534 to fix gcc-10 (since that's open for doc changes) > and have now pushed r11-9881 > as well. > > Maybe this year I'll remember to do it for gcc-12 after we branch from trunk! Add an entry to branching.html! Richard.
On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 at 11:55, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 at 11:36, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > > > > > This fixes some misleading text in the libstdc++ manual that says the > > > > docs for the gcc-11 branch refer to mainline. > > > > > > > > Richi, is this OK for the gcc-11 branch now? It's been wrong for 11.1 > > > > and 11.2, but it would still be nice to fix. > > > > > > Yes, it's OK. I notice the same problem exists on the GCC 10 branch > > > but GCC 9 at least mentions GCC 9 once ;) > > > > Yes, I fixed it for gcc-9.3.0, but forgot to do it for gcc-10 and gcc-11. > > > > I pushed r10-10534 to fix gcc-10 (since that's open for doc changes) > > and have now pushed r11-9881 > > as well. > > > > Maybe this year I'll remember to do it for gcc-12 after we branch from trunk! > > Add an entry to branching.html! Like this? OK for wwwdocs? commit 7789dd25ce48039d9b6459340051e403f1f8b309 Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com> Date: Thu Apr 14 17:08:34 2022 +0100 Update branching.html with reminder for libstdc++ docs diff --git a/htdocs/branching.html b/htdocs/branching.html index f30a47e1..ff28eb51 100644 --- a/htdocs/branching.html +++ b/htdocs/branching.html @@ -40,6 +40,9 @@ git push origin tag basepoints/gcc-11 for the next major release in the <code>wwwdocs</code> repository and populate it with initial copies of <code>changes.html</code> and <code>criteria.html</code>.</li> + +<li>Libstdc++ maintainers should update references to "mainline GCC" in +<code>libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx*.xml</code>.</li> </ol> <h2>Web Site Updates</h2>
On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 at 11:55, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 at 11:36, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > > > > > > > This fixes some misleading text in the libstdc++ manual that says the > > > > > docs for the gcc-11 branch refer to mainline. > > > > > > > > > > Richi, is this OK for the gcc-11 branch now? It's been wrong for 11.1 > > > > > and 11.2, but it would still be nice to fix. > > > > > > > > Yes, it's OK. I notice the same problem exists on the GCC 10 branch > > > > but GCC 9 at least mentions GCC 9 once ;) > > > > > > Yes, I fixed it for gcc-9.3.0, but forgot to do it for gcc-10 and gcc-11. > > > > > > I pushed r10-10534 to fix gcc-10 (since that's open for doc changes) > > > and have now pushed r11-9881 > > > as well. > > > > > > Maybe this year I'll remember to do it for gcc-12 after we branch from trunk! > > > > Add an entry to branching.html! > > Like this? OK for wwwdocs? Maybe "Notify libstdc++ maintainers to update ..." ? OK with that change. Richard.
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 at 08:01, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 at 11:55, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 at 11:36, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > This fixes some misleading text in the libstdc++ manual that says the > > > > > > docs for the gcc-11 branch refer to mainline. > > > > > > > > > > > > Richi, is this OK for the gcc-11 branch now? It's been wrong for 11.1 > > > > > > and 11.2, but it would still be nice to fix. > > > > > > > > > > Yes, it's OK. I notice the same problem exists on the GCC 10 branch > > > > > but GCC 9 at least mentions GCC 9 once ;) > > > > > > > > Yes, I fixed it for gcc-9.3.0, but forgot to do it for gcc-10 and gcc-11. > > > > > > > > I pushed r10-10534 to fix gcc-10 (since that's open for doc changes) > > > > and have now pushed r11-9881 > > > > as well. > > > > > > > > Maybe this year I'll remember to do it for gcc-12 after we branch from trunk! > > > > > > Add an entry to branching.html! > > > > Like this? OK for wwwdocs? > > Maybe > > "Notify libstdc++ maintainers to update ..." > > ? > > OK with that change. Yes, that's better. Pushed with that change, thanks.
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx1998.xml b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx1998.xml index 792272bcf26..f1be6667cd7 100644 --- a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx1998.xml +++ b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx1998.xml @@ -18,8 +18,7 @@ This status table is based on the table of contents of ISO/IEC 14882:2003. </para> <para> -This section describes the C++ support in mainline GCC, not in any -particular release. +This section describes the C++ support in the GCC 11 release series. </para> <!-- Status is Yes or No, Broken/Partial--> diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2011.xml b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2011.xml index 88844f8f0cc..e06f2479763 100644 --- a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2011.xml +++ b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2011.xml @@ -34,8 +34,7 @@ This status table is based on the table of contents of ISO/IEC 14882:2011. </para> <para> -This section describes the C++11 support in mainline GCC, not in any -particular release. +This section describes the C++11 support in the GCC 11 release series. </para> <!-- Status is Yes or No, Broken/Partial--> diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2014.xml b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2014.xml index 5dc287707d8..deb15c7f0d5 100644 --- a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2014.xml +++ b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2014.xml @@ -29,8 +29,8 @@ since C++11 and the implementation is complete. </para> <para> -This section describes the C++14 and library TS support in mainline GCC, -not in any particular release. +This section describes the C++14 and library TS support in the GCC 11 +release series. </para> <!-- Status is Yes or No, Broken/Partial--> diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2017.xml b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2017.xml index 11372bb28b3..52bbce0a2be 100644 --- a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2017.xml +++ b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2017.xml @@ -23,8 +23,8 @@ since that release. </para> <para> -This section describes the C++17 and library TS support in mainline GCC, -not in any particular release. +This section describes the C++17 and library TS support in the GCC 11 +release series. </para> <para> diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2020.xml b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2020.xml index 9e9777ea85f..411a337c534 100644 --- a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2020.xml +++ b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2020.xml @@ -20,8 +20,8 @@ presence of the required flag. </para> <para> -This section describes the C++20 and library TS support in mainline GCC, -not in any particular release. +This section describes the C++20 and library TS support in the GCC 11 +release series. </para> <para> diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxxtr1.xml b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxxtr1.xml index 021cb6394a7..6533857ba12 100644 --- a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxxtr1.xml +++ b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxxtr1.xml @@ -22,8 +22,7 @@ In this implementation the header names are prefixed by </para> <para> -This page describes the TR1 support in mainline GCC, not in any particular -release. +This page describes the TR1 support in the GCC 11 release series. </para> <!-- Status is Yes or No, Broken/Partial--> diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxxtr24733.xml b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxxtr24733.xml index 139b94442e8..4b6d64c7c6a 100644 --- a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxxtr24733.xml +++ b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxxtr24733.xml @@ -16,8 +16,7 @@ decimal floating-point arithmetic </para> <para> -This page describes the TR 24733 support in mainline GCC, not in any -particular release. +This page describes the TR 24733 support in the GCC 11 release series. </para> <!-- Status is Yes or No, Broken/Partial-->