Message ID | 20220216202642.2063582-1-ppalka@redhat.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | c++: double non-dep folding from finish_compound_literal [PR104565] | expand |
On 2/16/22 15:26, Patrick Palka wrote: > In finish_compound_literal, we perform non-dependent expr folding before > calling check_narrowing (ever since r9-5973). But ever since r10-7096, > check_narrowing also performs non-dependent expr folding of its own. > This double folding cause tsubst to see non-templated trees during the > second folding, which causes a spurious error in the below testcase. > > This patch removes this first folding operation; it now seems obviated > by the second one. > > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for > trunk/10/11? OK for trunk now, release branches in about a month. > PR c++/104565 > > gcc/cp/ChangeLog: > > * semantics.cc (finish_compound_literal): Don't perform > non-dependent expr folding before calling check_narrowing. > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > * g++.dg/template/non-dependent22.C: New test. > --- > gcc/cp/semantics.cc | 10 +++------- > gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/non-dependent22.C | 12 ++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/non-dependent22.C > > diff --git a/gcc/cp/semantics.cc b/gcc/cp/semantics.cc > index 0cb17a6a8ab..114baa48710 100644 > --- a/gcc/cp/semantics.cc > +++ b/gcc/cp/semantics.cc > @@ -3203,13 +3203,9 @@ finish_compound_literal (tree type, tree compound_literal, > return error_mark_node; > compound_literal = reshape_init (type, compound_literal, complain); > if (SCALAR_TYPE_P (type) > - && !BRACE_ENCLOSED_INITIALIZER_P (compound_literal)) > - { > - tree t = instantiate_non_dependent_expr_sfinae (compound_literal, > - complain); > - if (!check_narrowing (type, t, complain)) > - return error_mark_node; > - } > + && !BRACE_ENCLOSED_INITIALIZER_P (compound_literal) > + && !check_narrowing (type, compound_literal, complain)) > + return error_mark_node; > if (TREE_CODE (type) == ARRAY_TYPE > && TYPE_DOMAIN (type) == NULL_TREE) > { > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/non-dependent22.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/non-dependent22.C > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000000..83a6a13f15b > --- /dev/null > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/non-dependent22.C > @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ > +// PR c++/104565 > +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } } > + > +struct apa { > + constexpr int n() const { return 3; } > +}; > + > +template<class> > +int f() { > + apa foo; > + return int{foo.n()}; // no matching function for call to 'apa::n(apa*)' > +}
diff --git a/gcc/cp/semantics.cc b/gcc/cp/semantics.cc index 0cb17a6a8ab..114baa48710 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/semantics.cc +++ b/gcc/cp/semantics.cc @@ -3203,13 +3203,9 @@ finish_compound_literal (tree type, tree compound_literal, return error_mark_node; compound_literal = reshape_init (type, compound_literal, complain); if (SCALAR_TYPE_P (type) - && !BRACE_ENCLOSED_INITIALIZER_P (compound_literal)) - { - tree t = instantiate_non_dependent_expr_sfinae (compound_literal, - complain); - if (!check_narrowing (type, t, complain)) - return error_mark_node; - } + && !BRACE_ENCLOSED_INITIALIZER_P (compound_literal) + && !check_narrowing (type, compound_literal, complain)) + return error_mark_node; if (TREE_CODE (type) == ARRAY_TYPE && TYPE_DOMAIN (type) == NULL_TREE) { diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/non-dependent22.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/non-dependent22.C new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..83a6a13f15b --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/non-dependent22.C @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +// PR c++/104565 +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } } + +struct apa { + constexpr int n() const { return 3; } +}; + +template<class> +int f() { + apa foo; + return int{foo.n()}; // no matching function for call to 'apa::n(apa*)' +}