| Message ID | 20220129162609.GW2646553@tucnak |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | testsuite: Fix up tree-ssa/divide-7.c testcase [PR95424] | expand |
On Jan 29, 2022, at 8:26 AM, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > This test fails everywhere, because ? doesn't match literal ?. > It should use \\? instead. I've also changed those .s in there. > Tested on x86_64-linux (-m32/-m64) and powerpc64le-linux, ok for trunk? Ok.
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/divide-7.c.jj 2022-01-29 11:11:39.338627697 +0100 +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/divide-7.c 2022-01-29 17:11:31.516070531 +0100 @@ -5,5 +5,5 @@ int f(int x) { return 1 / x; } -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "1 / x_..D.;" "optimized" } } */ -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump ".. <= 2 ? x_..D. : 0;" "optimized" } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "1 / x_\[0-9]\+\\\(D\\\);" "optimized" } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump " <= 2 \\? x_\[0-9]\+\\\(D\\\) : 0;" "optimized" } } */
Hi! This test fails everywhere, because ? doesn't match literal ?. It should use \\? instead. I've also changed those .s in there. Tested on x86_64-linux (-m32/-m64) and powerpc64le-linux, ok for trunk? 2022-01-29 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> PR tree-optimization/95424 * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/divide-7.c: Fix up regexps in scan-tree-dump{,-not}. Jakub