diff mbox

[C++] Fix -Wnonnull-compare warning from dynamic_cast <...> (this) (PR c++/69850)

Message ID 20160218215148.GX3017@tucnak.redhat.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Jakub Jelinek Feb. 18, 2016, 9:51 p.m. UTC
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 10:45:46PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> And here is a fix for the dynamic_cast issue I've mentioned recently.
> Alternatively, ifnonnull could build instead NE_EXPR with swapped last
> two arguments on the COND_EXPR, and then I believe the cp_fold change would
> not be needed.
> 
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
> Or do you prefer the NE_EXPR variant?

Here is the variant with NE_EXPR, it works on *nonnull* tests, haven't
tested it more yet, but will overnight.
Personally I think this is better, because folding wants to canonicalize
the COND_EXPR with EQ_EXPR and no code in the then branch to NE_EXPR
with no code in the else branch, so it means we waste some more GC memory.

2016-02-18  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

	PR c++/69850
	* rtti.c (ifnonnull): Set TREE_NO_WARNING on the condition, use
	NE_EXPR instead of EQ_EXPR and swap last two arguments on COND_EXPR.

	* g++.dg/warn/Wnonnull-compare-4.C: New test.


	Jakub

Comments

Jakub Jelinek Feb. 19, 2016, 7:55 a.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 10:51:48PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 10:45:46PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Hi!
> > 
> > And here is a fix for the dynamic_cast issue I've mentioned recently.
> > Alternatively, ifnonnull could build instead NE_EXPR with swapped last
> > two arguments on the COND_EXPR, and then I believe the cp_fold change would
> > not be needed.
> > 
> > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
> > Or do you prefer the NE_EXPR variant?
> 
> Here is the variant with NE_EXPR, it works on *nonnull* tests, haven't
> tested it more yet, but will overnight.
> Personally I think this is better, because folding wants to canonicalize
> the COND_EXPR with EQ_EXPR and no code in the then branch to NE_EXPR
> with no code in the else branch, so it means we waste some more GC memory.

And even this patch passed bootstrap/regtest on x86_64-linux and i686-linux.

> 2016-02-18  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
> 
> 	PR c++/69850
> 	* rtti.c (ifnonnull): Set TREE_NO_WARNING on the condition, use
> 	NE_EXPR instead of EQ_EXPR and swap last two arguments on COND_EXPR.
> 
> 	* g++.dg/warn/Wnonnull-compare-4.C: New test.

	Jakub
Jason Merrill Feb. 19, 2016, 7:09 p.m. UTC | #2
OK.

Jason
diff mbox

Patch

--- gcc/cp/rtti.c.jj	2016-02-11 10:50:58.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/cp/rtti.c	2016-02-18 22:47:04.023079812 +0100
@@ -507,12 +507,13 @@  get_typeid (tree type, tsubst_flags_t co
 static tree
 ifnonnull (tree test, tree result, tsubst_flags_t complain)
 {
-  return build3 (COND_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (result),
-		 build2 (EQ_EXPR, boolean_type_node, test,
-			 cp_convert (TREE_TYPE (test), nullptr_node,
-				     complain)),
-		 cp_convert (TREE_TYPE (result), nullptr_node, complain),
-		 result);
+  tree cond = build2 (NE_EXPR, boolean_type_node, test,
+		      cp_convert (TREE_TYPE (test), nullptr_node, complain));
+  /* This is a compiler generated comparison, don't emit
+     e.g. -Wnonnull-compare warning for it.  */
+  TREE_NO_WARNING (cond) = 1;
+  return build3 (COND_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (result), cond, result,
+		 cp_convert (TREE_TYPE (result), nullptr_node, complain));
 }
 
 /* Execute a dynamic cast, as described in section 5.2.6 of the 9/93 working
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wnonnull-compare-4.C.jj	2016-02-18 18:03:04.777398778 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wnonnull-compare-4.C	2016-02-18 18:02:46.414652133 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ 
+// PR c++/69850
+// { dg-do compile }
+// { dg-options "-Wnonnull-compare" }
+
+struct A { virtual ~A (); int foo (); };
+struct B { virtual ~B () { } };
+struct C : B, A { };
+
+int
+A::foo ()
+{
+  C *c = dynamic_cast<C *> (this);	// { dg-bogus "nonnull argument" }
+  return !c;
+}