Message ID | 20140928125710.GB302@x4 |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On 2014.09.28 at 14:57 +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > On 2014.09.28 at 14:36 +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote: > > > > Can you use HOST_WIDE_INT_1U for this? > > Sure. Thanks for the suggestion. > (Fix now resembles similar idiom in data-streamer-in.c) I checked in the fix as obvious.
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 3:09 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de> wrote: > On 2014.09.28 at 14:57 +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: >> On 2014.09.28 at 14:36 +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote: >> > >> > Can you use HOST_WIDE_INT_1U for this? >> >> Sure. Thanks for the suggestion. >> (Fix now resembles similar idiom in data-streamer-in.c) > > I checked in the fix as obvious. Sorry for the delay. Yes, the fix is obvious. Thanks.
diff --git a/gcc/data-streamer.c b/gcc/data-streamer.c index 0e19c72162aa..785beb5165fa 100644 --- a/gcc/data-streamer.c +++ b/gcc/data-streamer.c @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ bp_unpack_var_len_int (struct bitpack_d *bp) if ((half_byte & 0x8) == 0) { if ((shift < HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT) && (half_byte & 0x4)) - result |= - ((HOST_WIDE_INT)1 << shift); + result |= - (HOST_WIDE_INT_1U << shift); return result; }