From patchwork Thu Aug 14 07:57:30 2014 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jakub Jelinek X-Patchwork-Id: 379864 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8777140097 for ; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 17:57:50 +1000 (EST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender:date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; q=dns; s= default; b=aC9ujWyBqYHHY87WVyyUYe9IOFwUZKopzYz4Qpr+dKQUXPeJemUZA t4pnk5n8iV3p3bOOcMXx/R5PepKImefmV6RlBY9R8aZfeTptsPpkklRq1ymL9kZL BqKXlpkX/I4KQWEdm2H31vZlc6FrKsHuWKJMGhf9oey+q/eBOAI+zI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender:date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=CGHuspkgRcf6Ju3J9qe6qon9NRU=; b=D5xa8RuEIqiDZqG9qd2C5ccFEjul PjVcjCubPj+ENHEWQh1deezj0Z62mq2dWdKlDOQOae2JfhCoVh/ZvZyoxy6hHG/6 r2HOhzz9dt2jrGIxcfZ8gx5VR0XA+8Rr9ZDwXaedm1oAt6+pwXYCNWgFT6O5qSdC lejaKlH+d79iq+k= Received: (qmail 5342 invoked by alias); 14 Aug 2014 07:57:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5329 invoked by uid 89); 14 Aug 2014 07:57:42 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, RP_MATCHES_RCVD, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 07:57:41 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s7E7vb8U007825 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 14 Aug 2014 03:57:37 -0400 Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (ovpn-116-53.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.53]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s7E7vZjU025357 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 14 Aug 2014 03:57:36 -0400 Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.14.8/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s7E7vXgm030453; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 09:57:33 +0200 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.14.8/8.14.8/Submit) id s7E7vUfx030452; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 09:57:30 +0200 Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 09:57:30 +0200 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Richard Biener Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, "Joseph S. Myers" Subject: Re: [PATCH][www] Document versioning scheme for GCC 5 and up Message-ID: <20140814075730.GC1784@tucnak.redhat.com> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <20140813124443.GU1784@tucnak.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140813124443.GU1784@tucnak.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-IsSubscribed: yes Hi! Apparently using numbers without dots in 4.9/5 Regression has the disadvantage that some bugs make it to the query even when they should not, like [4.8 Regression] ICE in set_address_disp, at rtlanal.c:5537 or avx512f-ceil-sfix-vec-2.c and avx512f-floor-sfix-vec-2.c FAIL on Solaris9/x86 Matching a string 5 in the short_desc is simply too fragile. Note even the 4.9 search strings are fragile, some people happened to type [4.8 Regression] Something bla bla, works in 4.9 or similar. Wonder what extra resources would it take to use regexps instead, and dunno if we don't need to escape it further. Thoughts? Jakub --- index.html 13 Aug 2014 13:09:00 -0000 1.934 +++ index.html 14 Aug 2014 07:52:01 -0000 @@ -176,10 +176,10 @@ Any additions? Don't be shy, send them
Serious + href="https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=regexp&short_desc=\[([ 0-9.%2F]*[ %2F])*5[ %2F][ 0-9.%2F]*[Rr]egression *\]&target_milestone=4.8.4&target_milestone=4.9.2&target_milestone=5.0&known_to_fail_type=allwordssubstr&known_to_work_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&gcchost_type=allwordssubstr&gcchost=&gcctarget_type=allwordssubstr&gcctarget=&gccbuild_type=allwordssubstr&gccbuild=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=SUSPENDED&bug_status=WAITING&bug_status=REOPENED&priority=P1&priority=P2&priority=P3&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=">Serious regressions. All + href="https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=regexp&short_desc=\[([ 0-9.%2F]*[ %2F])*5[ %2F][ 0-9.%2F]*[Rr]egression *\]&target_milestone=4.8.4&target_milestone=4.9.2&target_milestone=5.0&known_to_fail_type=allwordssubstr&known_to_work_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&gcchost_type=allwordssubstr&gcchost=&gcctarget_type=allwordssubstr&gcctarget=&gccbuild_type=allwordssubstr&gccbuild=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=SUSPENDED&bug_status=WAITING&bug_status=REOPENED&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=">All regressions.