From patchwork Wed Feb 19 18:18:35 2014 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "H.J. Lu" X-Patchwork-Id: 321978 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 383312C00B0 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 05:18:58 +1100 (EST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender:date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=f3qk0xF2EnHZU+p7wDgLWhzsc/gL+ RrlBRxgzYafdFOOswi18uuBk0ODAoRrVznz30E25U3HZHrdlQ8GmeXa8msiPZAM2 KPcjqwpZmRh0WBfrHsCN0rdU7jKTM7/b0nWvldiaBwHFafQuxPgdsVdHo/co8j6A WpZ+aq1ExUVFW4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender:date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:mime-version :content-type; s=default; bh=tVbMzb4YhcjUVquFwzuW7NvzkD8=; b=FAD gzIQGAlvJ2vaNqQ6WWFL/r/aDJabT0E/r6kxbQ+YVbcSKZJ7z+AgIz+ZWihYgbAg DZCpsvDoToIrHZ56WDx+R1eZZROXTKqcyxIAu1SPmbAlG4FinElwR+6VVhvpB70t R87GdkhFQIIQdnCNlSJntJkQtMV+oz6XLHMzFW94= Received: (qmail 13248 invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2014 18:18:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13236 invoked by uid 89); 19 Feb 2014 18:18:51 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, NO_DNS_FOR_FROM, RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mga01.intel.com Received: from mga01.intel.com (HELO mga01.intel.com) (192.55.52.88) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 18:18:50 +0000 Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Feb 2014 10:18:37 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 Received: from gnu-6.sc.intel.com ([10.3.194.64]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Feb 2014 10:18:35 -0800 Received: by gnu-6.sc.intel.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4F044201FAD; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 10:18:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 10:18:35 -0800 From: "H.J. Lu" To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Uros Bizjak Subject: PATCH: PR target/60207: Wrong TFmode check in construct_container Message-ID: <20140219181835.GA20480@intel.com> Reply-To: "H.J. Lu" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Hi, There is no need to check TFmode for X86_64_INTEGER_CLASS since TFmode is passed in vector register. This patch has been pre-approved for mainline and release branches. I checked it into mainline and will backport it to 4.7/4.8 branch. H.J. Index: gcc/ChangeLog =================================================================== --- gcc/ChangeLog (revision 207912) +++ gcc/ChangeLog (working copy) @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +2014-02-19 H.J. Lu + + PR target/60207 + * config/i386/i386.c (construct_container): Remove TFmode check + for X86_64_INTEGER_CLASS. + 2014-02-19 Uros Bizjak PR target/59794 Index: gcc/config/i386/i386.c =================================================================== --- gcc/config/i386/i386.c (revision 207912) +++ gcc/config/i386/i386.c (working copy) @@ -6966,7 +6966,7 @@ construct_container (enum machine_mode m if (n == 2 && regclass[0] == X86_64_INTEGER_CLASS && regclass[1] == X86_64_INTEGER_CLASS - && (mode == CDImode || mode == TImode || mode == TFmode) + && (mode == CDImode || mode == TImode) && intreg[0] + 1 == intreg[1]) return gen_rtx_REG (mode, intreg[0]);