| Message ID | 20130214180211.GA31072@code-monkey.de |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
On 02/14/2013 10:02 AM, Tilman Sauerbeck wrote: > Hi, > here's a patch that adds a testcase for PR 55987. > Is xfail the right thing to use here? I went with that since I guess the > PR won't be fixed anytime soon ;) > > I haven't assigned copyright to the FSF -- is this patch small enough to > go in without it? > > Thanks, > Tilman I would prefer to add the test after the bug has been fixed. Tests for unfixed bugs clutter up the test suite. Janis > 2013-02-14 Tilman Sauerbeck <tilman@code-monkey.de> > > PR target/55987 > * gcc.target/arm/pr55987.c: New. > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr55987.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr55987.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..7dd9de0 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr55987.c > @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ > +/* { dg-do compile } */ > +/* { dg-options "-O2" } */ > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times ".word" 1 { xfail *-*-* } } } */ > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "bic" { xfail *-*-* } } } */ > + > +unsigned f(unsigned x, unsigned y) > +{ > + unsigned c = 0x7f7f7f7f; > + > + return (x & c) ^ (y & ~c); > +} > >
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr55987.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr55987.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..7dd9de0 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr55987.c @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options "-O2" } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times ".word" 1 { xfail *-*-* } } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "bic" { xfail *-*-* } } } */ + +unsigned f(unsigned x, unsigned y) +{ + unsigned c = 0x7f7f7f7f; + + return (x & c) ^ (y & ~c); +}