From patchwork Sun Jan 20 17:10:54 2013 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jack Howarth X-Patchwork-Id: 213966 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 18C002C0079 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 04:11:15 +1100 (EST) Comment: DKIM? See http://www.dkim.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; x=1359306676; h=Comment: DomainKey-Signature:Received:Received:Received:Received:Received: Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:User-Agent:Mailing-List:Precedence:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender: Delivered-To; bh=rGU2qnIF96PQKO5GfM0urCKxlGk=; b=kry9uTNlv50I8aQ TQ+9oo0FABro5v4fwb3ppqZS5NiFI2vP3EXosT+vkWqxotosTDiK9QlRsSX8W2hU toM6/wOPTiuzdz8W32H03qIlM1LxpsvaX5Tk/WstrASfQCHLdgWip3z+pnPWxsx3 UGRPqrggrc4CLVXirL+Sq5rM5emY= Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=Received:Received:X-SWARE-Spam-Status:X-Spam-Check-By:Received:Received:Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:User-Agent:Mailing-List:Precedence:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender:Delivered-To; b=Ss7NI4K3c69r8W20XuRX7WGDi0NUFkqNKBWaPmoJFBCPohwj/n1I/xy3TMGiCt uTYQT4Y8ATAnLvglbVFQOb5OA6q6ndJjPGC7AfT7ZQoTSnIY7G/hqCmW1XwNyubJ 2zzdjbsjZ/N466OWvVY4AVnVZPtRz6Z1yVX3biUrnVKXg=; Received: (qmail 6313 invoked by alias); 20 Jan 2013 17:11:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 6276 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Jan 2013 17:11:01 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, RP_MATCHES_RCVD, TW_GD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from bromo.med.uc.edu (HELO bromo.med.uc.edu) (129.137.3.146) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 17:10:56 +0000 Received: from bromo.med.uc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by bromo.med.uc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D4FE400007; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 12:10:55 -0500 (EST) Received: (from howarth@localhost) by bromo.med.uc.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id r0KHAsCH031425; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 12:10:54 -0500 Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 12:10:54 -0500 From: Jack Howarth To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: jason@redhat.com, mikestump@comcast.net, iain@codesourcery.com Subject: [PATCH] PR53235: xfail scan-assembler-times in nested-4.C on darwin Message-ID: <20130120171054.GA31423@bromo.med.uc.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Current gcc trunk fails the scan-assembler-times on this test case due to Apple's incomplete support for dwarf4. The attached patch xfail's the scan-assembler-times on debug_types until Apple updates its cctools to fully support dwarf4. Okay for gcc trunk? Jack ps I don't see a huge rush to dwarf-4 over on clang/llvm development with the last mention at http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2011-February/013563.html. gcc/testsuite/ 2013-01-19 Jack Howarth PR debug/53235 * g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/nested-4.C: XFAIL on darwin. Index: gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/nested-4.C =================================================================== --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/nested-4.C (revision 195320) +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/nested-4.C (working copy) @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ // PR debug/53235 // { dg-options "-gdwarf-4 -fdebug-types-section" } -// { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "debug_types" 2 } } +// { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "debug_types" 2 { xfail *-*-darwin* } } } namespace E { class O {};