--- c99status.html	6 Apr 2010 11:34:44 -0000	1.55
+++ c99status.html	14 Mar 2011 13:52:00 -0000	1.56
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ paragraph 6) do not count as library iss
 
 <p>This page describes the C99 support in mainline GCC, not in any
 particular release.  Information is also available on <a
+href="gcc-4.6/c99status.html">C99 support in GCC 4.5</a>, <a
 href="gcc-4.5/c99status.html">C99 support in GCC 4.5</a>, <a
 href="gcc-4.4/c99status.html">C99 support in GCC 4.4</a>, <a
 href="gcc-4.3/c99status.html">C99 support in GCC 4.3</a>, <a
--- develop.html	16 Dec 2010 12:08:36 -0000	1.112
+++ develop.html	14 Mar 2011 13:52:00 -0000	1.113
@@ -436,6 +436,12 @@ stages of development, branch points, an
        |                                        v
        |                                   GCC 4.5.2 release (2010-12-16)
        |
+       +-- GCC 4.6 branch created ------+
+       |                                 \
+       v                                  v
+  GCC 4.7 Stage 1 (starts 2011-03-14)     
+       |
+       |
        v
 
 </pre>
--- index.html	7 Mar 2011 10:53:25 -0000	1.778
+++ index.html	14 Mar 2011 17:25:47 -0000	1.780
@@ -108,6 +108,23 @@ Any additions?  Don't be shy, send them 
 <dl class="status">
 
 <dt><strong>Current release series:</strong>
+  GCC 4.6.0 (<a href="gcc-4.6/changes.html">changes</a>)
+</dt><dd>
+  Status:
+  <!--GCC 4.6 status below-->
+  <a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-03/msg00176.html">2011-03-14</a>
+  <!--GCC 4.6 status above-->
+  (regression fixes and docs only, RM approval required).
+  <br />
+  <a
+  href="http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&amp;short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&amp;short_desc=4.6&amp;target_milestone=4.3.6&amp;target_milestone=4.4.6&amp;target_milestone=4.5.3&amp;target_milestone=4.6.0&amp;known_to_fail_type=allwordssubstr&amp;known_to_work_type=allwordssubstr&amp;long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&amp;long_desc=&amp;bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&amp;bug_file_loc=&amp;gcchost_type=allwordssubstr&amp;gcchost=&amp;gcctarget_type=allwordssubstr&amp;gcctarget=&amp;gccbuild_type=allwordssubstr&amp;gccbuild=&amp;keywords_type=allwords&amp;keywords=&amp;bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&amp;bug_status=NEW&amp;bug_status=ASSIGNED&amp;bug_status=SUSPENDED&amp;bug_status=WAITING&amp;bug_status=REOPENED&amp;priority=P1&amp;priority=P2&amp;priority=P3&amp;emailtype1=substring&amp;email1=&amp;emailtype2=substring&amp;email2=&amp;bugidtype=include&amp;bug_id=&amp;votes=&amp;chfieldfrom=&amp;chfieldto=Now&amp;chfieldvalue=&amp;cmdtype=doit&amp;order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&amp;field0-0-0=noop&amp;type0-0-0=noop&amp;value0-0-0=">Serious
+  regressions</a>.
+  <a
+  href="http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&amp;short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&amp;short_desc=4.6&amp;target_milestone=4.3.6&amp;target_milestone=4.4.6&amp;target_milestone=4.5.3&amp;target_milestone=4.6.0&amp;known_to_fail_type=allwordssubstr&amp;known_to_work_type=allwordssubstr&amp;long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&amp;long_desc=&amp;bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&amp;bug_file_loc=&amp;gcchost_type=allwordssubstr&amp;gcchost=&amp;gcctarget_type=allwordssubstr&amp;gcctarget=&amp;gccbuild_type=allwordssubstr&amp;gccbuild=&amp;keywords_type=allwords&amp;keywords=&amp;bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&amp;bug_status=NEW&amp;bug_status=ASSIGNED&amp;bug_status=SUSPENDED&amp;bug_status=WAITING&amp;bug_status=REOPENED&amp;emailtype1=substring&amp;email1=&amp;emailtype2=substring&amp;email2=&amp;bugidtype=include&amp;bug_id=&amp;votes=&amp;chfieldfrom=&amp;chfieldto=Now&amp;chfieldvalue=&amp;cmdtype=doit&amp;order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&amp;field0-0-0=noop&amp;type0-0-0=noop&amp;value0-0-0=">All
+  regressions</a>.
+</dd>
+
+<dt><strong>Previous release series:</strong>
   <a href="gcc-4.5/">GCC 4.5.2</a>
   (<a href="gcc-4.5/changes.html">changes</a>)
 </dt><dd>
@@ -125,7 +142,7 @@ Any additions?  Don't be shy, send them 
   regressions</a>.
 </dd>
 
-<dt><strong>Previous release series:</strong>
+<dt><strong>Older maintained release series:</strong>
   <a href="gcc-4.4/">GCC 4.4.5</a>
   (<a href="gcc-4.4/changes.html">changes</a>)
 </dt><dd>
@@ -159,19 +176,19 @@ Any additions?  Don't be shy, send them 
  </dd>
 
 <dt><strong>Active development:</strong>
-  GCC 4.6.0 (<a href="gcc-4.6/changes.html">changes</a>)
+  GCC 4.7.0 (<a href="gcc-4.7/changes.html">changes</a>)
 </dt><dd>
   Status:
-  <!--GCC 4.6 status below-->
-  <a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-03/msg00081.html">2011-03-07</a>
-  <!--GCC 4.6 status above-->
-  (regression fixes and docs only).
+  <!--GCC 4.7 status below-->
+  <a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-03/msg00178.html">2011-03-14</a>
+  <!--GCC 4.7 status above-->
+  Stage 1, open for development.
   <br />
   <a
-  href="http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&amp;short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&amp;short_desc=4.6&amp;target_milestone=4.3.6&amp;target_milestone=4.4.6&amp;target_milestone=4.5.3&amp;target_milestone=4.6.0&amp;known_to_fail_type=allwordssubstr&amp;known_to_work_type=allwordssubstr&amp;long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&amp;long_desc=&amp;bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&amp;bug_file_loc=&amp;gcchost_type=allwordssubstr&amp;gcchost=&amp;gcctarget_type=allwordssubstr&amp;gcctarget=&amp;gccbuild_type=allwordssubstr&amp;gccbuild=&amp;keywords_type=allwords&amp;keywords=&amp;bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&amp;bug_status=NEW&amp;bug_status=ASSIGNED&amp;bug_status=SUSPENDED&amp;bug_status=WAITING&amp;bug_status=REOPENED&amp;priority=P1&amp;priority=P2&amp;priority=P3&amp;emailtype1=substring&amp;email1=&amp;emailtype2=substring&amp;email2=&amp;bugidtype=include&amp;bug_id=&amp;votes=&amp;chfieldfrom=&amp;chfieldto=Now&amp;chfieldvalue=&amp;cmdtype=doit&amp;order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&amp;field0-0-0=noop&amp;type0-0-0=noop&amp;value0-0-0=">Serious
+  href="http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&amp;short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&amp;short_desc=4.7&amp;target_milestone=4.3.6&amp;target_milestone=4.4.6&amp;target_milestone=4.5.3&amp;target_milestone=4.6.0&amp;target_milestone=4.7.0&amp;known_to_fail_type=allwordssubstr&amp;known_to_work_type=allwordssubstr&amp;long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&amp;long_desc=&amp;bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&amp;bug_file_loc=&amp;gcchost_type=allwordssubstr&amp;gcchost=&amp;gcctarget_type=allwordssubstr&amp;gcctarget=&amp;gccbuild_type=allwordssubstr&amp;gccbuild=&amp;keywords_type=allwords&amp;keywords=&amp;bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&amp;bug_status=NEW&amp;bug_status=ASSIGNED&amp;bug_status=SUSPENDED&amp;bug_status=WAITING&amp;bug_status=REOPENED&amp;priority=P1&amp;priority=P2&amp;priority=P3&amp;emailtype1=substring&amp;email1=&amp;emailtype2=substring&amp;email2=&amp;bugidtype=include&amp;bug_id=&amp;votes=&amp;chfieldfrom=&amp;chfieldto=Now&amp;chfieldvalue=&amp;cmdtype=doit&amp;order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&amp;field0-0-0=noop&amp;type0-0-0=noop&amp;value0-0-0=">Serious
   regressions</a>.
   <a
-  href="http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&amp;short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&amp;short_desc=4.6&amp;target_milestone=4.3.6&amp;target_milestone=4.4.6&amp;target_milestone=4.5.3&amp;target_milestone=4.6.0&amp;known_to_fail_type=allwordssubstr&amp;known_to_work_type=allwordssubstr&amp;long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&amp;long_desc=&amp;bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&amp;bug_file_loc=&amp;gcchost_type=allwordssubstr&amp;gcchost=&amp;gcctarget_type=allwordssubstr&amp;gcctarget=&amp;gccbuild_type=allwordssubstr&amp;gccbuild=&amp;keywords_type=allwords&amp;keywords=&amp;bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&amp;bug_status=NEW&amp;bug_status=ASSIGNED&amp;bug_status=SUSPENDED&amp;bug_status=WAITING&amp;bug_status=REOPENED&amp;emailtype1=substring&amp;email1=&amp;emailtype2=substring&amp;email2=&amp;bugidtype=include&amp;bug_id=&amp;votes=&amp;chfieldfrom=&amp;chfieldto=Now&amp;chfieldvalue=&amp;cmdtype=doit&amp;order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&amp;field0-0-0=noop&amp;type0-0-0=noop&amp;value0-0-0=">All
+  href="http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&amp;short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&amp;short_desc=4.7&amp;target_milestone=4.3.6&amp;target_milestone=4.4.6&amp;target_milestone=4.5.3&amp;target_milestone=4.6.0&amp;target_milestone=4.7.0&amp;known_to_fail_type=allwordssubstr&amp;known_to_work_type=allwordssubstr&amp;long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&amp;long_desc=&amp;bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&amp;bug_file_loc=&amp;gcchost_type=allwordssubstr&amp;gcchost=&amp;gcctarget_type=allwordssubstr&amp;gcctarget=&amp;gccbuild_type=allwordssubstr&amp;gccbuild=&amp;keywords_type=allwords&amp;keywords=&amp;bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&amp;bug_status=NEW&amp;bug_status=ASSIGNED&amp;bug_status=SUSPENDED&amp;bug_status=WAITING&amp;bug_status=REOPENED&amp;emailtype1=substring&amp;email1=&amp;emailtype2=substring&amp;email2=&amp;bugidtype=include&amp;bug_id=&amp;votes=&amp;chfieldfrom=&amp;chfieldto=Now&amp;chfieldvalue=&amp;cmdtype=doit&amp;order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&amp;field0-0-0=noop&amp;type0-0-0=noop&amp;value0-0-0=">All
   regressions</a>.
 </dd>
 
--- gcc-4.6/buildstat.html	1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ gcc-4.6/buildstat.html	14 Mar 2011 13:52:00 -0000	1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+<html>
+
+<head>
+<title>Build status for GCC 4.6</title>
+</head>
+
+<body>
+<h1>Build status for GCC 4.6</h1>
+
+<p>This list summarizes build reports for GCC 4.6.x, with links to the
+archived mail messages that reported the builds and to test result
+summaries.</p>
+
+<p>Instructions for running the test suite and for submitting test results
+are part of
+<a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/install/test.html">
+Installing GCC: Testing</a>.
+Instructions for reporting a successful &quot;make bootstrap&quot;,
+including a list of information to include in such a report, are part of
+<a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/install/finalinstall.html">
+Installing GCC: Final Installation</a>.</p>
+
+</body>
+</html>
--- gcc-4.6/c99status.html	1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ gcc-4.6/c99status.html	14 Mar 2011 13:52:00 -0000	1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,372 @@
+<html>
+
+<head>
+<title>Status of C99 features in GCC 4.6</title>
+</head>
+
+<body>
+<h1>Status of C99 features in GCC 4.6</h1>
+
+<p>This table is based on the list in the foreword to <a
+href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1256.pdf">N1256</a>
+(ISO/IEC 9899:1999 (E), consolidated with ISO/IEC 9899:1999/Cor.1:2001
+(E), ISO/IEC 9899:1999/Cor.2:2004 (E) and ISO/IEC 9899:1999/Cor.3:2007
+(E)).</p>
+
+<p>Where "Library Issue" is listed in conjunction with some other
+status, this means that some compiler support is needed for the
+library support, or desirable in conjunction with it.  Note that the
+headers required of conforming freestanding implementations (clause 4
+paragraph 6) do not count as library issues.</p>
+
+<p>This page describes the C99 support in GCC 4.6.  Information on <a
+href="../c99status.html">C99 support in mainline GCC</a> is also
+available.</p>
+
+<p>See below the table for further notes on some issues.</p>
+
+<table border="1">
+<tr><th>Feature</th>
+    <th>Library Issue</th>
+    <th>Done</th>
+    <th>Broken</th>
+    <th>Missing</th>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em>restricted character set support via digraphs and
+    <br /><code>&lt;iso646.h&gt;</code> (originally specified in AMD1)</em></td>
+    <td></td>
+    <td>Done</td><td></td><td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em>wide character library support in
+    <code>&lt;wchar.h&gt;</code><br />and <code>&lt;wctype.h&gt;</code>
+    (originally specified in AMD1)</em></td>
+    <td>Library Issue</td>
+    <td></td><td></td><td>Missing</td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em>more precise aliasing rules via effective type</em></td>
+    <td></td><td>Done</td>
+    <td></td><td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em>restricted pointers</em></td>
+    <td></td><td>Done</td>
+    <td></td><td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em>variable-length arrays</em></td>
+    <td></td><td>Done</td><td></td>
+    <td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em>flexible array members</em></td>
+    <td></td><td>Done</td><td></td><td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em><code>static</code> and type qualifiers<br />in parameter array declarators</em></td>
+    <td></td><td>Done</td><td></td><td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em>complex (and imaginary) support in <code>&lt;complex.h&gt;</code></em></td>
+    <td></td><td>Done</td><td></td><td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em>type-generic math macros in <code>&lt;tgmath.h&gt;</code></em></td>
+    <td>Library Issue</td>
+    <td>Done</td><td></td><td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em>the <code>long long int</code> type and library functions</em></td>
+    <td></td><td>Done</td>
+    <td></td><td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em>increased minimum translation limits</em></td>
+    <td></td><td>Done</td>
+    <td></td><td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em>additional floating-point characteristics<br />in <code>&lt;float.h&gt;</code></em></td>
+    <td></td><td>Done</td>
+    <td></td><td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em>remove implicit <code>int</code></em></td>
+    <td></td><td>Done</td>
+    <td></td><td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em>reliable integer division</em></td>
+    <td></td><td>Done</td><td></td><td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em>universal character names (<code>\u</code> and <code>\U</code>)</em></td>
+    <td></td><td>Done</td><td></td><td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em>extended identifiers</em></td>
+    <td></td><td></td><td></td><td>Missing</td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em>hexadecimal floating-point constants and
+    <code>%a</code><br /> and <code>%A</code>
+    <code>printf</code>/<code>scanf</code> conversion specifiers</em></td>
+    <td>Library Issue</td><td>Done</td>
+    <td></td><td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em>compound literals</em></td>
+    <td></td><td>Done</td><td></td>
+    <td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em>designated initializers</em></td>
+    <td></td><td>Done</td><td></td>
+    <td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em><code>//</code> comments</em></td>
+    <td></td><td>Done</td>
+    <td></td><td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em>library functions in <code>&lt;inttypes.h&gt;</code></em></td>
+    <td>Library Issue</td>
+    <td></td><td></td><td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em>extended integer types in <code>&lt;stdint.h&gt;</code></em></td>
+    <td></td>
+    <td></td><td></td><td>Missing</td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em>remove implicit function declaration</em></td>
+    <td></td><td>Done</td>
+    <td></td><td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em>preprocessor arithmetic<br />done in <code>intmax_t</code>/<code>uintmax_t</code></em></td>
+    <td></td><td>Done</td><td></td><td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em>mixed declarations and code</em></td>
+    <td></td><td>Done</td><td></td><td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em>new block scopes for selection<br />and iteration statements</em></td>
+    <td></td><td>Done</td><td></td><td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em>integer constant type rules</em></td>
+    <td></td><td>Done</td><td></td><td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em>integer promotion rules</em></td>
+    <td></td><td>Done</td><td></td><td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em>macros with a variable number of arguments</em></td>
+    <td></td><td>Done</td>
+    <td></td><td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em>the <code>vscanf</code> family of functions
+    in<br /><code>&lt;stdio.h&gt;</code> and <code>&lt;wchar.h&gt;</code></em></td>
+    <td>Library Issue</td>
+    <td>Done</td><td></td><td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em>additional math library functions in <code>&lt;math.h&gt;</code></em></td>
+    <td>Library Issue</td>
+    <td></td><td></td><td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em>treatment of error conditions by math library functions (<code>math_errhandling</code>)</em></td>
+    <td>Library Issue</td>
+    <td></td><td></td><td>Missing</td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em>floating-point environment access<br />in <code>&lt;fenv.h&gt;</code></em></td>
+    <td>Library Issue</td>
+    <td></td><td></td><td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em>IEC 60559 (also known as<br />IEC 559 or IEEE arithmetic) support</em></td>
+    <td></td><td></td><td>Broken</td><td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em>trailing comma allowed in <code>enum</code> declaration</em></td>
+    <td></td><td>Done</td>
+    <td></td><td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em><code>%lf</code> conversion specifier<br />allowed in <code>printf</code></em></td>
+    <td>Library Issue</td><td>Done</td><td></td><td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em>inline functions</em></td>
+    <td></td><td>Done</td><td></td>
+    <td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em>the <code>snprintf</code> family of functions in <code>&lt;stdio.h&gt;</code></em></td>
+    <td>Library Issue</td>
+    <td>Done</td><td></td><td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em>boolean type in <code>&lt;stdbool.h&gt;</code></em></td>
+    <td></td>
+    <td>Done</td><td></td><td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em>idempotent type qualifiers</em></td>
+    <td></td><td>Done</td><td></td><td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em>empty macro arguments</em></td>
+    <td></td><td>Done</td><td></td><td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em>new struct type compatibility<br />rules (tag compatibility)</em></td>
+    <td></td><td>Done</td><td></td><td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em>additional predefined macro names</em></td>
+    <td></td><td></td><td></td><td>Missing</td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em><code>_Pragma</code> preprocessing operator</em></td>
+    <td></td><td>Done</td><td></td><td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em>standard pragmas</em></td>
+    <td></td><td></td><td></td><td>Missing</td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em><code>__func__</code> predefined identifier</em></td>
+    <td></td><td>Done</td>
+    <td></td><td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em><code>va_copy</code> macro</em></td>
+    <td></td><td>Done</td><td></td><td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em>additional <code>strftime</code> conversion specifiers</em></td>
+    <td>Library Issue</td><td>Done</td><td></td><td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em>deprecate <code>ungetc</code> at the<br />beginning of a binary file</em></td>
+    <td>Library Issue</td>
+    <td></td><td></td><td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em>remove deprecation of<br />aliased array parameters</em></td>
+    <td></td><td>Done</td>
+    <td></td><td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em>conversion of array to pointer not limited to lvalues</em></td>
+    <td></td><td>Done</td>
+    <td></td><td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em>relaxed constraints on aggregate<br />and union initialization</em></td>
+    <td></td><td>Done</td>
+    <td></td><td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em>relaxed restrictions on portable header names</em></td>
+    <td></td><td>Done</td>
+    <td></td><td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><td><em><code>return</code> without expression not permitted
+    in<br />function that returns a value (and vice versa)</em></td>
+    <td></td><td>Done</td>
+    <td></td><td></td>
+</tr>
+
+<tr><th>Feature</th>
+    <th>Library Issue</th>
+    <th>Done</th>
+    <th>Broken</th>
+    <th>Missing</th>
+</tr>
+</table>
+
+<h2>Further notes</h2>
+
+<ul>
+
+<li>cpp has limited support for multibyte character sets.</li>
+
+<li>IEC 60559 is IEEE 754 floating point.  This works if and only if
+the hardware is perfectly compliant, but GCC does not define
+<code>__STDC_IEC_559__</code> or implement the associated standard
+pragmas; nor do some options such as <code>-frounding-math</code> to
+enable the pragmas globally work in all cases (for example, required
+exceptions may not be generated) and contracting expressions (e.g.,
+using fused multiply-add) is not restricted to source-language
+expressions as required by C99.</li>
+
+<li>Compiler support is needed for thorough support of <code>math_errhandling</code>; see
+messages <a
+href="http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2000-06/msg00008.html">1</a>,
+<a
+href="http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2000-06/msg00014.html">2</a>,
+<a
+href="http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2000-06/msg00015.html">3</a>
+on this subject to libc-hacker.  The compiler needs to mark its output
+from compilations using <code>-fno-trapping-math</code>
+or <code>-fno-math-errno</code>, possibly using
+the <code>.gnu_attribute</code> mechanism, to indicate that built-in
+function optimizations may have been applied that mean that not all
+calls report error status in a particular way; the static linker
+needs to put this information in executables and shared libraries and
+the C library needs to use it to set <code>math_errhandling</code> at
+startup to a conservatively correct value based on the information
+from the compiler.  There is currently some limited GNU C Library
+support that only conforms as long as the above options are not used
+anywhere in the program.</li>
+
+<li>GCC doesn't have <code>wprintf</code>, <code>wscanf</code> and
+<code>wcsftime</code> format checking support.</li>
+
+<li>GCC does not support the Annex G imaginary types and complex
+multiplication and division have excess overflows at runtime (although
+not beyond those permitted by C99).</li>
+
+<li><code>&lt;stdint.h&gt;</code> is provided by GCC, or fixed where
+the system headers provide a nonconforming version, on some but not
+yet all systems.  On systems where types in this header have been
+defined as <code>char</code>, GCC retains this definition although it
+is not permitted by C99.</li>
+
+<li>Some of the C99 predefined macros represent properties of the
+compiler and library together and so defining them for the whole
+translation unit requires cooperation with the library;
+a <a href="http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2009-04/msg00005.html">GNU
+C Library patch</a> for this is pending review.</li>
+
+<li><code>const</code>-qualified compound literals could share storage
+with each other and with string literals, but currently don't.</li>
+
+<li>The information provided by <code>static</code> in parameter array
+declarators is not used for optimization.  It might make sense to use
+it in future in conjunction with <a href="../projects/prefetch.html">work
+on prefetching</a>.</li>
+
+<li>The list above differs from that in N1256 as follows:
+"LIA compatibility annex" is removed, since it refers to C99's
+conformance to another standard rather than something for C
+implementations to do.  The <code>&lt;stdint.h&gt;</code> and
+<code>&lt;inttypes.h&gt;</code> entries have been separated, but are a
+single entry in C99.</li>
+
+</ul>
+
+</body>
+</html>
--- gcc-4.7/changes.html	1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ gcc-4.7/changes.html	14 Mar 2011 13:52:00 -0000	1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+<html>
+
+<head>
+<title>GCC 4.7 Release Series &mdash; Changes, New Features, and Fixes</title>
+</head>
+
+<!-- GCC maintainers, please do not hesitate to update/contribute entries
+     concerning those part of GCC you maintain!  2002-03-23, Gerald.
+-->
+
+<body>
+<h1>GCC 4.7 Release Series<br />Changes, New Features, and Fixes</h1>
+
+<h2>Caveats</h2>
+
+  <ul>
+    <li>...</li>
+ </ul>
+
+<h2>General Optimizer Improvements</h2>
+
+  <ul>
+    <li>...</li>
+  </ul>
+
+<h2>New Languages and Language specific improvements</h2>
+
+<h3>Ada</h3>
+
+<h3>C family</h3>
+
+<h3>C++</h3>
+  
+  <h4>Runtime Library (libstdc++)</h4>
+
+<h3>Fortran</h3>
+
+<h3>Java (GCJ)</h3>
+
+<h2 id="targets">New Targets and Target Specific Improvements</h2>
+
+<h3>IA-32/x86-64</h3>
+  <ul>
+    <li>...</li>
+  </ul>
+
+<h3>MIPS</h3>
+
+<h3 id="picochip">picochip</h3>
+
+<h2>Documentation improvements</h2>
+
+<h2>Other significant improvements</h2>
+
+</body>
+</html>
--- gcc-4.7/criteria.html	1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ gcc-4.7/criteria.html	14 Mar 2011 13:52:00 -0000	1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,145 @@
+<html>
+
+<head>
+<title>GCC 4.7 Release Criteria</title> </head>
+
+<body>
+
+<h1>GCC 4.7 Release Criteria</h1>
+
+<p>This page provides the release criteria for GCC 4.7.</p>  
+
+<p>The GCC team (and, in particular, the Release Manager) will attempt
+to meet these criteria before the release of GCC 4.7.</p>
+
+<p>In all cases, these criteria represent the minimum functionality
+required in order to make the release.  If this level of minimum
+functionality is not provided by a release candidate, then that
+candidate will probably not become the eventual release.  However, a
+release candidate that does meet these criteria may not necessarily
+become the official release; there may be other unforeseen issues that
+prevent release.  For example, if support for the Intel Pentium II is
+required by the release criteria, it is nevertheless unlikely that GCC
+would be released even though it did not support the Intel Pentium.</p>
+
+<p>Because the development of GCC is largely dependent on volunteers,
+the Release Manager and/or Steering Committee may eventually have to
+decide whether to make a release, even if the criteria here are not
+met.  For example, if no volunteer can be found to verify correct
+operation of a particular application program on a particular system,
+then that criterion may be abandoned.</p>
+
+<h1>Languages</h1>
+
+<p>GCC supports several programming languages, including Ada, C, C++,
+Objective-C, Fortran, and Java.  For the purposes of making releases,
+however, we will consider primarily C and C++, as those are the
+languages used by the vast majority of users.  Therefore, if, below,
+the criteria indicate, for example, that there should be no DejaGNU
+regressions on a particular platform, that criteria should be read as
+applying only to DejaGNU regressions within the C, C++, and C++
+runtime library testsuites.</p>
+
+<h1>Primary and Secondary Platforms</h1>
+
+<p>GCC targets a vast number of platforms.  We have classified these
+platforms into three categories: primary, secondary, and tertiary.
+Primary platforms are popular systems, both in the sense that there
+are many such systems in existence and in the sense that GCC is used
+frequently on those systems.  Secondary platforms are also popular
+systems, but are either somewhat less popular than the primary
+systems, or are considered duplicative from a testing perspective.
+All platforms that are neither primary nor secondary are tertiary
+platforms.</p>
+
+<p>Our release criteria for primary platforms is:</p>
+<ul>
+
+<li>
+<p>All regressions open in Bugzilla have been analyzed, and all are
+deemed as either unlikely to affect most users, or are determined to
+have a minimal impact on affected users.  For example, a
+typographical error in a diagnostic might be relatively common, but
+also has minimal impact on users.</p>
+
+<p>In general, regressions where the compiler generates incorrect
+code, or refuses to compile a valid program, will be considered to
+be sufficiently severe to block the release, unless there are
+substantial mitigating factors.</p>
+</li>  
+
+<li>The DejaGNU testsuite has been run, and compared with a run of
+the testsuite on the previous release of GCC, and no regressions are
+observed.</li>
+</ul>
+
+<p>Our release criteria for the secondary platforms is:</p>
+<ul>
+<li>The compiler bootstraps successfully, and the C++ runtime library
+builds.</li>
+
+<li>The DejaGNU testsuite has been run, and a substantial majority of
+the tests pass.</li>
+</ul>
+
+<p>There are no release criteria for tertiary platforms.</p>
+
+<p>In contrast to previous releases, we have removed all mention of
+explicit application testing.  It is our experience that, with the
+resources available, it is very difficult to methodically carry out
+such testing. However, we expect that interested users will submit
+bug reports for problems encountered building and using popular
+packages.  Therefore, we do not intend the elimination of application
+testing from our criteria to imply that we will not pay attention to
+application testing.</p>
+
+<h2>Primary Platform List</h2>
+
+<p>The primary platforms are:</p>
+<ul>
+<li>arm-linux-gnueabi</li>
+<li>i386-unknown-freebsd</li>
+<li>i686-pc-linux-gnu</li>
+<li>mipsisa64-elf</li>
+<li>powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu</li>
+<li>sparc-sun-solaris2.10</li>
+<li>x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu</li>
+</ul>
+
+<h2>Secondary Platform List</h2>
+
+<p>The secondary platforms are:</p>
+<ul>
+<li>hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11</li>
+<li>powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0</li>
+<li>i686-apple-darwin</li>
+<li>i686-pc-cygwin</li>
+<li>i686-mingw32</li>
+<li>ia64-unknown-linux-gnu</li>
+<li>s390x-linux-gnu</li>
+</ul>
+
+<h1>Code Quality and Compilation Time</h1>
+
+<p>In addition to correctness issues (e.g., generating incorrect code,
+or issuing an invalid diagnostic, or refusing to compile valid code),
+we will also consider code quality (i.e., the speed with which the
+generated code executes) and compilation time (i.e., the speed with
+which the compiler executes).</p>
+
+<p>It is difficult, if not impossible, to set out specific criteria
+for determining what level of regression is acceptable for these issues.
+In contrast to most correctness issues, where nothing short of correct
+is acceptable, it is reasonable to trade off behavior for code quality
+and compilation time.  For example, it may be acceptable, when
+compiling with optimization, if the compiler is slower, but generates
+superior code.  It may also be acceptable for the compiler to generate
+inferior code on some test cases if it generates substantially
+superior code on other test cases.  Therefore, the Release Manager, or
+parties to whom he or she delegates responsibility, will make
+determinations on a case-by-case basis as to whether or not a code
+quality or compilation time regression is sufficiently severe as to
+merit blocking the release.</p>
+
+</body>
+</html>
